tpo33
The reading and the lecture are both about the pattern of fine lines surrounding the skeletal bones of a dinosaur called sinosauropteryx which makes a sense of such a proof that sinosauropteryx had feathers. More specifically, the writer refutes the theory of that dinosaur had feathers. The lecturer in the listening passage disagrees. she strongly believes that the form of lines represent feathers. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, the experts mention that these lines were occurred after the animals' death from decomposition in volcanic ash and cause someone to misunderstand what these are really. However, the lecturer disputes these points. she says that it is improbable as a result of other animals' fossils structures which were found in the same area but they have not decomposed. Furthermore, she declares that these lines would be feathers based on well-preserved condition.
Secondly, the reading states that being these lines related to frills more likely than feathers. Nevertheless, the lecturer denies this argument. she argues that there is a serious difference between them. feathers contain protein which is called beta-keratin while frills don't. In terms of fact, we could realize these lines as a form of feathers.
Finally, the reading claims that the structure of lines was located around the backbone and the tile of the sinosauropteryx fossil which could not be used as feathers to fly or decrease body temperature. On the other hand, the lecturer explains other functions of feeders. In addition, she exemplifies the style of a peacock that has colorful feathers in the Ltd tail to interest visitors. So sinosauropteryxs could have feathers for showing.
In conclusion, both the writer and professor hold conflicting views about having of feathers by Sinosauroopteryxs. It’s clear that they will have trouble finding common ground on this issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-05 | shuya | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-03 | Kawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-08-03 | Hamide | 70 | view |
| 2020-08-02 | fafoolisalar | 80 | view |
| 2020-07-28 | fafoolisalar | 70 | view |
- TPO30 73
- TPO-45 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...rer in the listening passage disagrees. she strongly believes that the form of line...
^^^
Line 2, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'animals'' or 'animal's'?
Suggestion: animals'; animal's
...hat these lines were occurred after the animals death from decomposition in volcanic as...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...er, the lecturer disputes these points. she says that it is improbable as a result ...
^^^
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: She
...ess, the lecturer denies this argument. she argues that there is a serious differen...
^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Feathers
...e is a serious difference between them. feathers contain protein which is called beta-ke...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 274, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ich is called beta-keratin while frills dont. In terms of fact, we could realize the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, really, second, secondly, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1373.03311258 122% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33226837061 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98481562493 2.5805825403 116% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 145.348785872 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562300319489 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 13.0662251656 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.5626803027 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.45 110.228320801 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.65 21.698381199 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06452816374 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 4.45695364238 179% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0924849624826 0.272083759551 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0290073381537 0.0996497079465 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351096406239 0.0662205650399 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587477965446 0.162205337803 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371957820419 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.3589403974 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.8541721854 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.