TPO37
The reading asserts that turtle excluder device (TED) is not an efficient device for solving the problem of turtles which catch with the shrimp boats. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons mentions by the reading passage.
The reading argues that catching the turtles by shrimp boats happens rarely. Besides, using TED can cost losing some shrimps through this turtle passages. On the contrary, the professor brings up the fact that there are thousands of shrimp boats on the seas. Therefore, they catch thousands of turtles accidentally during the year. Moreover, nowadays population of turtles are very small, so catching thousands of them every year can be a severe problem.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that there are some alternative methods for solving this problem. One of these methods is reducing the time that shrimp boats are allowed to keep their nets underwater. Thus, the chance of catching turtles would decrease. Conversely, the lecturer undermines the point that it is a good idea but just in theory. She argues that it is tough to monitor this process unless we record the boats when they go into sea until they come back which is not practical.
Finally, the reading mentions that method of TED is not a practical solution since there are some large turtles which cannot escape from TEDs. The professor dismisses this idea and says that these TEDs can be easily modified. So, they can produce larger TEDs and, as a consequence, the size of TEDs could not be a problem anymore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ons mentions by the reading passage. The reading argues that catching the turtle...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1301.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9846743295 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39972791967 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55938697318 0.540411800872 104% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1728561267 49.2860985944 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9285714286 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.2367328918 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.