Tpo41: professor and passage challenge each others on how to rules on coal ash could beneficial
new Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times new Roman"">The passage and the lecture discuss new regulations for handling and storing coal ash made by power plants. The author of the passage presents three reasons to demonstrate that stricter regulations might have not positive results. However, the lecturer believes none of the reasons could strongly refute the use of the new regulation.
new Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times new Roman"">The author argues that power companies have currently effective rules. For instance, they already must use the liner in landfills. The lecturer argues against this reason and believes that liner application has not been sufficient and still harmful chemical compounds have found in the environment due to the liner usage. As a result, this hypothesis seems to be really dubious.
new Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times new Roman"">Furthermore, the reading passage holds the view that developing new rules might bring recyclers into other products. Nevertheless, the lecturer illustrates that strict rules about Mercury had brought brilliant feedbacks. Consequently, new regulations are not an obstacle for the recycling process.
new Roman","serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times new Roman"">Finally, the reading asserts that new rules cause a remarkable increase in the costs of power companies and customers. The lecturer opposes this point by explaining that the costs of these changes are just 15 million dollars. The result of these costs is a one percent increase in costumers’ bills. Accordingly, that is well worth for such a positive change in the environment. this claim does not possess a strong support in order to be acceptable.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-20 | sarkar | 63 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | raminshahbad | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-18 | mike10m1 | 81 | view |
| 2019-06-25 | popop | 85 | view |
| 2019-02-27 | cathy60321 | 80 | view |
- TPO41 IndependentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teacher were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they were nowadays.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 42-integrated 75
- Do you agree or disagree: It is impossible to always be completely honest with yourfriends? 60
- TPO 40 integrated 80
- TPO-48 - Integrated Writing Task 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
new Roman','serif';mso-farea...
^^^
Line 1, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
new Roman','serif';mso-fareast-font-family:&ap...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
...efute the use of the new regulation. new Roman','serif';mso-farea...
^^^
Line 3, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...f the new regulation. new Roman','serif';mso-fareast-font-family:&ap...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
...pothesis seems to be really dubious. new Roman','serif';mso-farea...
^^^
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...to be really dubious. new Roman','serif';mso-fareast-font-family:&ap...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: New
... obstacle for the recycling process. new Roman','serif';mso-farea...
^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...he recycling process. new Roman','serif';mso-fareast-font-family:&ap...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 476, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...h a positive change in the environment. this claim does not possess a strong support...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, consequently, finally, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, really, so, still, well, for instance, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 22.412803532 67% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.64876033058 5.08290768461 131% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.43958772333 2.5805825403 327% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 137.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566115702479 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 419.366225166 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.55342163355 129% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 21.2450331126 75% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.9347087206 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.266666667 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1333333333 21.698381199 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06452816374 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 4.19205298013 215% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178880456229 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740258302209 0.0996497079465 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457409712078 0.0662205650399 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134336149928 0.162205337803 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346197029055 0.0443174109184 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.3589403974 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 53.8541721854 40% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.3 11.0289183223 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 20.99 12.2367328918 172% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 63.6247240618 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.498013245 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.