TPO43 - agnostids and related theories
The reading claims that agonostids were primitive of modern-day insects and behaved and lived samilar to them. The author elaborates his viewpoints by providing three main reasons. Nevertheless, the professor believes that theories have serious weakness and refutes each of them.
First, the reading avers that they were free-swimming predators like other types of primitive arthropods since there were enough smaller organisms in ancient ocean to prey on. However, the professor refutes this concept by stating that althought its true some type of insects were predators, but they had large eyes in order to persuade their prey; so, agnostids couldn't be predator because of their tiny eyes and in some cases they were blind. Also, they didn't have another sense ability to chase prey perfectly.
Furthermore, the article posits that they were seafloor dwellers and scavenging dead organisms on the ancient ocean' floor. On the other hand, the lectrurer brings up the fact that seafloor dwellers couldn't swim fast and far and normally locallized in spesific area and geographic locations. but, agnostids were multiple area since they can move very fast and easily through the ocean; hence, they couldn't be seafloor dwellers.
Finally, the article asserts that they may were parasites like, flees, ticks, and mites in modern-day. Contrary, the lectrurer casts doubt on this claim by stating that parasites wouldn't live in huge populations and limit their populations since they killed of the organism in this way. In addition, she states that agnostids were lived in a large population and vast fussils of them found in various regions; hence, this theories rule out easily.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 365, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...r to persuade their prey; so, agnostids couldnt be predator because of their tiny eyes ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... some cases they were blind. Also, they didnt have another sense ability to chase pre...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ings up the fact that seafloor dwellers couldnt swim fast and far and normally localliz...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...spesific area and geographic locations. but, agnostids were multiple area since the...
^^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...d easily through the ocean; hence, they couldnt be seafloor dwellers. Finally, the a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...on this claim by stating that parasites wouldnt live in huge populations and limit thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 419, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...f them found in various regions; hence, this theories rule out easily.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, in addition, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 265.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3320754717 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50542735902 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1794215752 49.2860985944 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 110.228320801 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1666666667 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 4.19205298013 167% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.39371128821 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131651110962 0.0996497079465 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724371483899 0.0662205650399 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216925100404 0.162205337803 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618886393921 0.0443174109184 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.2367328918 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.42419426049 106% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.