TPO43 - agnostids and related theories
The passage and the lecture discuss how agnostids lived in the ocean. The author of the passage presents three theories to ascertain the ways these small animals could prey on and get their own food to be alive. The lecturer believes none of the reasons could pretty sure and explain how they obviously get their needs in the vast ocean ecosystem.
The author argues that the agnostids may be free-swimming predators that feed of smaller animals. Moreover, that knows many smaller organisms were in the ancient ocean that were pretty suitable for them. The lecturer argues against this theory and believes that, for do these, they must have a large well-developed eye. It is known that they had a poorly developed eye and may be they were completely blind. As a result, agnostids did not have an efficient system for this kind of prey on.
Furthermore, the reading passage holds a view that agnostids may have dwelled on the seafloor and fed of dead organisms. Nevertheless, the author illustrates that primitive arthropods, who living this way, donot have ability to move fast and so they have a small geographical area, but agnostids had lived in multiple areas and they were able to move very fast .Consequently, this theory could not be applies to them.
Finally, the reading asserts that agnostids are parasites -a kind of animals who living on and feeding off large organisms-. The lecturer opposes this point by explaining that they population is not very large. If they feed off larger animals with large amounts of food, their population would grow up so fast. Accordingly, this claim does not possess a strong support in order to be acceptable.
- TPO43Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related 66
- TPO43 - agnostids and related theories 81
- TPO 42-integrated 75
- Do you agree or disagree: The way people dresses is a good indication of his or herpersonality or character. 63
- Do you agree or disagree: It is impossible to always be completely honest with yourfriends? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... on and get their own food to be alive. The lecturer believes none of the reasons c...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...r needs in the vast ocean ecosystem. The author argues that the agnostids may be...
^^^
Line 3, column 374, Rule ID: MAY_BE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'maybe' (=perhaps)?
Suggestion: maybe
...hat they had a poorly developed eye and may be they were completely blind. As a result...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eas and they were able to move very fast .Consequently, this theory could not be a...
^^
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Consequently
...s and they were able to move very fast .Consequently, this theory could not be applies to th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, finally, furthermore, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, well, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.4613686534 115% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 280.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95714285714 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61397343959 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 145.348785872 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539285714286 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7746621162 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 21.698381199 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.35714285714 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419390735479 0.272083759551 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145017617992 0.0996497079465 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831995247529 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249021272641 0.162205337803 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105441712543 0.0443174109184 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.3589403974 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 63.6247240618 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.