In the United States employees have the option of work to four days per week.
The reading and the lecture both are about the employees in the United States have the option of working a four-day work per week for four-fifths of normal pay. The author of reading believes that this will be beneficial for the economy of the country, employee and the companies. The lecturer casts doubt on the points made in the reading passage. He says that four-day work will not beneficial for anyone.
First of all, the author says that the shortened week would increase company profits because there will be error-prone employees since they would feel relax and alert. The company will do a profit due to paying only fourth-fifths of payroll than normal and accomplish the same amount of work. The lecturer refutes this point and asserts that the company has to spend lots of money to give training to more numbers of employees and for their medical treatment. Additionally, they have to increase office space and the number of computers. So, eventually, the company has to pay the same as it pays for the five-hour employee.
Secondly, the author states that unemployment in the country will cut because more numbers of people can do the job. This point is challenged by the lecturer. He states that if the number of people hired, then they will expect to do overtime work. They will be asked to do work as employees of five days will do. So, ultimately, the number of employees will be reduced.
Finally, the author mentions that this option would be beneficial for employees are satisfied with the normal salary because they can spend their extra time with their families. The lecturer, on the other hand, states that by spending less time in office, their workability will decrease, so there are chances that they lose their job. Furthermore, they will less prone to get the job than employees from the option of five-hour work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | Hello GRE | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-20 | Hello GRE | 80 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 70 | view |
| 2023-11-25 | Apolytos | 80 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
- do you agree or disagree teachers are valued and appreciated by past day more than nowadays 70
- clay jar used as batteries in iraq 49
- traditional encyclopedias comparison with the online encyclopedia 76
- Hill pellets in United States 75
- teachers are influential for students than friends. Do you agree or disagree? 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 282, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he country, employee and the companies. The lecturer casts doubt on the points made...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...work will not beneficial for anyone. First of all, the author says that the s...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it pays for the five-hour employee. Secondly, the author states that unemplo...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...number of employees will be reduced. Finally, the author mentions that this o...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s from the option of five-hour work.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, then, as to, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87974683544 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47350161163 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 145.348785872 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465189873418 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.652211524 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7058823529 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5882352941 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06452816374 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292495514824 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101387091933 0.0996497079465 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.151837717018 0.0662205650399 229% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193999357236 0.162205337803 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144327714923 0.0443174109184 326% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.3589403974 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 53.8541721854 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.0289183223 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.2367328918 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.42419426049 88% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.