Urban Life or Rural Life?
In this set of materials the writer and the lecturer are discussing comparing city life to rural life. The widely contrast each other. The lecturer points out that urban living is more greener and environmentally conscious whereas the author claims that urban living is destroying our environment.The lecturer invalidates the writers points qit following details and examples.
First unlike the writer the lecturer mentions that its true that people live in urban areas still buy food from groceries. However luxury products like chocolate cant grown in rural areas so sometimes people live in rural areas go for buying luxury products from supermarkets. Thus they use car to arrive to the market. In conrast citizens live in urban areas can use bike, subway or foot for going to groceries. Its more efficient than cars because cars waste too much energy and create pollution.
Second apart from writers point cities can be beneficial and environmentally friendly. Because renewable energy is possible for big cities and most of people can energize their home. Some people can live in green houses. Also urban farm is becoming very popular.
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree? 70
- Urban Life or Rural Life? 50
- Sustainability of the Royal Family 60
- In your opinion which modern invention or scientific discovery has affected society the most? Use spesific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Desertification in earth 50
The widely contrast each other.
Description: what is the subject for this sentence? can you re-write this sentence?
urban living is more greener
urban living is much greener
that people live in urban areas still buy food from groceries.
that people who live in urban areas still buy food from groceries.
chocolate cant grown in rural areas
chocolate can't be grown in rural areas
The lecturer invalidates the writers points qit following details and examples.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to writers and points
Sentence: Second apart from writers point cities can be beneficial and environmentally friendly.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to writers and point
Sentence: In conrast citizens live in urban areas can use bike, subway or foot for going to groceries.
Error: conrast Suggestion: contrast
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
Read a good grammar book.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 15 in 30
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 6 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 12 12
No. of Words: 185 250
No. of Characters: 941 1200
No. of Different Words: 118 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.688 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.086 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.474 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 70 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 33 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 15.417 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.18 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.341 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.521 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.06 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4