A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Millions of animals have been used for experiments which develop science and technology.Those who are argue that, it is not right for animals and unacceptable, while others say that animal testing is very necessary for researches.In this essay, I shall discuss both of this views and give my opinion.
On one hand, people who support with animal testing think that it is very crucial to use animals in researches which can develop medical treatments and save many human lives.Vivisection can improve and adjust medicines to be more effective and less allergic before apply use with human. Without small creatures trials in experiments, the effectiveness of drugs could not be invented and a number of patients were suffer from diseases. The advantages of vivisection for human has overestimate which can justified and more worth than small creature lives. Therefore, using animals test is unavoidable painful which is vital for human lives.
On the other hand, some defenders argue that it is very cruel and not right to use animals in experiments. Animals are also a living creature as well as human. It is not fair and unacceptable to suffer them which is only for human benefits. They have to suffer and die from diseases and illness during laboratory which can be measured the effectiveness of medicines. For example, millions of mice have been used for test by scientists which do not care about how mice will suffer from pain. Those methods are very threatening and less humankind with animals. Therefore, it is very unfair for other lives to face with painful and illness which only prove human researches.
From my perspective, I agree with animal testing is necessary in researches. Even though, it is very cruel for other living creatures, it can help many human lives which are mare valuable lives than a handful for animals in experiments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 73 | view |
- Some people believe that the use of mobile phones in public is as annoying as smoking and should be banned, similarly to smoking. Give your opinion and examples from your own experience 70
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 76
- Several languages die every year Many people feel this is a positive trend and that a world with fewer languages promotes harmony and understanding between people Analyze both sides of this argument and provide your opinion 80
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males and females from certain profession because of their gender? 70
- In today s competitive world many families find it necessary for both parents to go out to work While some say the children in these families benefit from the additional income others feel they lack support because of their parents absence Give reasons fo 70
Those who are argue that, it is not right for animals and unacceptable
Those who argue that, it is not good and unacceptable for animals
discuss both of this views and give my opinion.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and views
and less allergic before apply use with human.
and less allergic before applying the use with human.
a number of patients were suffer from diseases
a number of patients will suffer from diseases
for human has overestimate
for human has overestimated
using animals test is unavoidable painful which is vital for human lives.
Description: can you re-write this sentence?
It is not fair and unacceptable to suffer them which is only for human benefits.
Description: check books how to use 'which'
Sentence: The advantages of vivisection for human has overestimate which can justified and more worth than small creature lives.
Description: A modal auxillary is not usually followed by a verb, past participle
Suggestion: Refer to can and justified
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
You don't use 'which' properly.
The essay topic is 'for food and research both', not only for 'research'
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 8 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 310 350
No. of Characters: 1513 1500
No. of Different Words: 149 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.196 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.881 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.562 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 93 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 75 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 47 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.143 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 12.264 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.429 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.39 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.546 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.091 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5