The tables below give information about sales of fair trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the .ain features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The tables below give information about sales of fair trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.

Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the .ain features and make comparisons where relevant.

The table show information regarding sales of fair trade-labelled coffee and bananas in several countries in Europe around five years. The sample had taken in 1999 and 2004.

Switzerland led in sales of fair trade-labelled coffee in 1999 by 3 million. The United Kingdom was in third position by 1.5 million and the second most sales fair trade-labelled was placed by Denmark for1.8 million. This situation wan contrary in 2004 because The United Kingdom led sales of fair trade-labelled after increasing significantly to 20 million and Switzerland was in second place by 3 million and fallowing by Denmark, Belgium and Sweden each country got 2 million, 1.7 million and 1 million in 2004.

On the other tables, sales of fair trade-labelled for bananas was led by Switzerland which was growth before only 15 million in 1999 to 47 million in 2004. The second place was positioned by Denmark for 2 million but in 5 years later, was declined tremendously to 0.9 million. Whereas, Sweden also was decrease between 1999 and 2004 each 1.8 million and 1 million. While The United Kingdom and Belgium was in fourth and fifth position in 1999 by1 million and 0.6 million and they climbed remarkably in 2004 to 5.5 million and 4 million.

Overall, bot The United Kingdom and Sweden was dominant in sales of fair trade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004.

Votes
Average: 6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-01-14 doctarlan1 73 view
2016-01-26 alberemperor@gmail.com 60 view
Essays by user alberemperor@g… :

Comments

The sample had taken in 1999 and 2004.
The sample was taken in 1999 and 2004.

The United Kingdom was in third position
The United Kingdom was in the third position

Switzerland was in second place
Switzerland was in the second place

bot The United Kingdom and Sweden was dominant
both The United Kingdom and Sweden were dominant

flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2

Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.0 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 4 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 230 200
No. of Characters: 1105 1000
No. of Different Words: 97 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.894 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.804 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.809 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 83 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 62 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 25 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 19 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.826 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.537 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.712 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.23 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4