Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
Any society lionizes a person it believes has brought opulent recognition, upliftment or progress of its stature. The achievements of the role models reveal the potential of a society, the ideals and moral scruples of the people being followed, tells us about the proclivities of the followers. In general, because the choice of role models represent the collective ideology of the society, the best way to understand the character of a society lies in studying the characters deified or veneated by the society.
To begin with, the nature of the contributions reveal the potential of the society as a whole. Throughout the world, human beings have a general propensity to stereotype one whole society by observing the deeds, or achievement of a few. While many a times these typecasts are prone to be irrational and unjustified, yet they do hold good in some cases. There indeed are societies across the planet who are good at accomplishing certain typical feats. For instance, the fact that some of the most famous atheletes in the world hail from Russia, like Maria Sharapova, Anastasia Fesikova and so on, is a clear indication of the penchant, capacity and hence the popularity of sports in the Russian societies. The fact that these atheletes are venerated and lauded in their countries reveals the innate sport-loving character of their native societies. Another example can be of the host Indian-origin CEOs of famous IT companies, like Sunder Pichai of Google, Satya Nadela of Microsoft, etc. These people are role models for lakhs of aspiring youths in the country and these major feats of success by Indians in the IT sector reveals the progressive, competent nature of the Indian society.
Furthermore, The progress of the society’s ideologies, the outlook is represented through its heroes, or idols. Worshipping a fallacious doctrinaire having a constrained and fallacious outlook of the world, is a tell-tale of how conservative the society is. In contrast, hailing an all-embracing, secular person tells us that the society is egalitarian and that it is accomodating in character. For example, when the Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau extended a whole hearted welcome to Syrian refugees when the rest of the world shunned them, it demonstrated the tolerance and the open-mindedness of the Canadian governance and the society that elected such a forward-looking leader as their Prime Minister.
However, not all ‘heroes’ reflect the collective proclivities or tastes of the society. For instance, when tawdry movie celebrities, parochial politicians, radical preachers, and showy, ostentatious business tycoons are idolized by a section of the mob, it seldom represents the aggregate penchant of the society. For instance, Pakistan is a country that provides a safe haven for most wanted terrorists like Laden, but also produces the world’s youngest Nobel Peace Prize winner. On one hand it might seem, from the heinous terror attacks designed from the country’s soil, as though the Pakistani society in general favours extremism and possesses a doctrinal approach towards life. However, it is from the same society that peace lovers like Malala Yousoufzai and democracy proponents like Benazir Bhutto had emerged and been victorious. Therefore, one cannot simply look at a particular section of the Pakistani crowd that eulogizes radical millitants, because there happens to be a greater proportion of the society that idolizes the likes of Malala and Benazir. Hence studying only one type of hero or role model might present a wrong picture of a society. Any study on the character of the heroes, must be based on whether the character in question is loved by the majority of the society or is it only a few toady followers that lionizes the same.
By way of conclusion, based on the arguments above I am of the opinion that the character of role models mirrors that of the society’s. However, while studying these very role models, it must be the due consideration to emphasize on the collective conception of the society regarding the person concerned. The study should not be circumscribed to include the opinions of a select few, because then the study itself will be biased.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Armchair Video, a chain of video rental stores."Because of declining profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Armchair Video's ten video rental stores. Raising prices is not a good option, sinc 83
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with therecommendation and explain 68
- Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument A recent study shows that people living on the continent of North America suffer 9 times more chronic fatigue and 31 times more chronic depression than do people living on the continent of Asia Interestingl 88
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive. Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated. Write a response in which you discuss th 70
- A recent study reported that pet owners have longer, healthier lives on average than do people who own no pets. Specifically, dog owners tend to have a lower incidence of heart disease. In light of these findings, Sherwood Hospital should form a partner 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l scruples of the people being followed, tells us about the proclivities of the f...
^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
...ds, or achievement of a few. While many a times these typecasts are prone to be irratio...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 503, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, the fact that some of the most famous atheletes in the world hail from Russia,...
^^
Line 3, column 1111, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: the; IT
...se major feats of success by Indians in the IT sector reveals the progressive, compete...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...section of the mob, it seldom represents the aggregate penchant of the society. F...
^^
Line 7, column 378, Rule ID: SAFE_HAVEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'haven'.
Suggestion: haven
..., Pakistan is a country that provides a safe haven for most wanted terrorists like Laden, ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 787, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... peace lovers like Malala Yousoufzai and democracy proponents like Benazir Bhutto...
^^
Line 7, column 1090, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...olizes the likes of Malala and Benazir. Hence studying only one type of hero or role ...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'regarding', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in contrast', 'in general', 'in some cases', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.282018111255 0.240241500013 117% => OK
Verbs: 0.117723156533 0.157235817809 75% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0853816300129 0.0880659088768 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0245795601552 0.0497285424764 49% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.0245795601552 0.0444667217837 55% => OK
Prepositions: 0.137128072445 0.12292977631 112% => OK
Participles: 0.0388098318241 0.0406280797675 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.0411181585 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0103492884864 0.030933414821 33% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.14489003881 0.0997080785238 145% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0103492884864 0.0249443105267 41% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0142302716688 0.0148568991511 96% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 4254.0 2732.02544248 156% => OK
No of words: 680.0 452.878318584 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.25588235294 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.10654576214 4.58838876751 111% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.413235294118 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.326470588235 0.280924506359 116% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.226470588235 0.200843997647 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.158823529412 0.132149295362 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0411181585 2.79330140395 109% => OK
Unique words: 343.0 219.290929204 156% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504411764706 0.48968727796 103% => OK
Word variations: 65.3635072896 55.4138127331 118% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6194690265 121% => OK
Sentence length: 27.2 23.380412469 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.5582096931 59.4972553346 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.16 141.124799967 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 23.380412469 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.72 0.674092028746 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 59.8470588235 51.4728631049 116% => OK
Elegance: 2.74418604651 1.64882698954 166% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.661616657832 0.391690518653 169% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.140087902895 0.123202303941 114% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0960527276572 0.077325440228 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.580842661336 0.547984918172 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.191028774943 0.149214159877 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.293468194201 0.161403998019 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143950080033 0.0892212321368 161% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.637972621553 0.385218514788 166% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0303563846194 0.0692045440612 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.536946152376 0.275328986314 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492295986409 0.0653680567796 75% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.4325221239 153% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 15.0 7.22455752212 208% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 22.0 13.5995575221 162% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.