TPO 45
Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
In the past, young people depended too much on their parents to make decisions for them; today young people are better able to make decisions about their own lives.
Making decisions is one of the most crucial concerns for everyone. Nowadays, most people use different consultation before deciding. Some hold the view that young people have become more autonomous about selecting their life direction, while others think that today's young are as reliant on their parents leading as young people in the past. I strongly agree with the first group opinion that today's life has helped children to become more independent in compare with the past.
First, science development has facilitated decision making. In fact, psychologists have done valuable researches which have made deciding easier. For instance, they have found that people can be categorized into 16 types. Each person can find out about his type by simply taking an MBTI test which takes 30 minutes. People can understand about their personalities and appropriate careers to their personalities. This helps young who want to attend to university and had difficulty to choose their majors. However, people used to ask from their parents and use their consultation for choosing their future career. Also, science development has made suitable circumstance for appearing various consulting companies. As we know, the development in science prepares convincing situation for new science growth. For example, adviser was not a job in the past, but today we can find various companies that provide different advising services. These services have made decision making easier for young.
The busy lifestyle has made them become autonomous from the first age of their life. Indeed, human lifestyle has been changed in the last decades. This new lifestyle leads human life to become more independent. Core family is one of the change has occurred in the structure of families that has an effect on the personality of children. As we know, the number of core family has been increased in the last century. One of the effects of this change is that it makes people more independent. To shed light on my point, let’s assume a child in a core family. This child faces with different situations that he should make decisions in day care. Therefore, he faces with variety situations from the first stages of life. However, a child who was born in extended family spends his childhood with his grandparents, so he does not have a chance to engage in society before school. Therefore, it affects child preparation for facing with difficulties and finding a solution for them.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that nowadays children have become more independent in compare with the past. We can look for the reason of this change in both science development and busier lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | nusybah | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | 3dra | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-08 | naziii | 76 | view |
- tpo 42 86
- tpo 46 70
- TPO 33-When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 60
- TPO 25 , Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities. 60
- TPO 28-Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Parents today are more involved in their children's education than parents were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 394, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'todays'' or 'today's'?
Suggestion: todays'; today's
...agree with the first group opinion that todays life has helped children to become more...
^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'in fact']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.255186721992 0.229887763892 111% => OK
Verbs: 0.188796680498 0.158761421928 119% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0788381742739 0.0866891130778 91% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0352697095436 0.046263068375 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0580912863071 0.0685040099705 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.139004149378 0.118717715034 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0622406639004 0.0351676179071 177% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70629374769 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0186721991701 0.0309702414327 60% => OK
Particles: 0.00207468879668 0.00188951952338 110% => OK
Determiners: 0.0746887966805 0.0887237588012 84% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0124481327801 0.0209618222197 59% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0145228215768 0.0139019557991 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2666.0 2387.08602151 112% => OK
No of words: 432.0 408.028673835 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1712962963 5.86048508987 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.381944444444 0.338922669872 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.270833333333 0.251872472559 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.194444444444 0.174417080927 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.136574074074 0.112833075102 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70629374769 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513888888889 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 58.2964712392 59.2087087015 98% => OK
How many sentences: 28.0 20.6684587814 135% => OK
Sentence length: 15.4285714286 20.5533526081 75% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6401804154 48.84282405 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2142857143 120.699889404 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 20.5533526081 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.464285714286 0.644075263715 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.54480286738 18% => OK
Readability: 42.5119047619 45.7405998639 93% => OK
Elegance: 1.61764705882 1.45489161554 111% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347434687658 0.300154397459 116% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118729468026 0.103427244359 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0897142714953 0.0752933317313 119% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.388607432623 0.497263757937 78% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.141474267334 0.151897553556 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981257333586 0.114077575197 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661655296784 0.0781384742642 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.290136723514 0.336927656856 86% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0792937228278 0.067059652881 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.232965785794 0.210909579961 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0797268984661 0.0618886996521 129% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8870967742 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.86379928315 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 17.0 4.91756272401 346% => Less neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.4623655914 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 12.0 2.75985663082 435% => Less neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 20.0 13.6433691756 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.