Appearance isn't everything. Discuss.
At the outset of this new millennium, uniqueness has become an essential trait of personality. Some people assert that outlook is the sole thing which matters while others condemn and say that it is the qualities of individuals rather than an appearance which can uplift an individual to the heights. I utterly believe that a mankind can be defined by a plenty of characters. This essay will scrutinize both virtues and will give a sophisticated solution.
Advocates of the first viewpoint say that outer beauty assists to earn name and fame. It also succors to get recognition among the generations. Nowadays, impression earns comparatively more than the expression. This can be illustrated with an example of Kim Kardashian, a Hollywood actoress, who never do any kind of standardized acting in a reality show instead it is her splendid looks and luxurious cars which make her renowned. In addition, some professions like modeling, acting and more only need the perfect looks.
On the flip side, a few have conflicting views. In this materialistic epoch, qualities like hard work, leadership, politeness also lend a helping hand to touch the skies. Undoubtedly, the overseas businessmen, officers are hired because of their Intelligent Quotient irrespective of their physical appearance. Moreover, majority of professions check the skills, spontaneity are appreciated as well as prioritized. For instance, Adolf Hitler is an universally known example who almost conquered half of the world irrespective of his cartoonish looks.
Mulling over the topic, albeit the looks of individuals play a significant role in some occupations but it is not helpful at each and every place. As, it is rightly remarked that Beauty fades, Character persists.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
2024-04-12 | reverjae | 78 | view |
2024-03-24 | MEBC Class | 89 | view |
2024-03-17 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 93
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- A person’s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions. Old-fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust, no longer seem important.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 11
- People attend colleges or universities for many different reasons (for example, new experiences, career preparation, increased knowledge etc.). Why do you think people attend colleges or universities? 67
- To learn effectively, children need to eat a healthy meal at school. How true is this statement? Whose responsibility is it to provide food for school children? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
At the outset of this new millennium, uniqueness has become an essential trait...
^^
Line 5, column 445, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...oritized. For instance, Adolf Hitler is an universally known example who almost co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, in addition, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35144927536 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10377427075 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8861879778 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3125 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.25 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0138262520702 0.244688304435 6% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00274394603382 0.084324248473 3% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0106272572919 0.0667982634062 16% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00720323267077 0.151304729494 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124763649645 0.056905535591 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.