TPO 22
The passage states that many critics argue which ethanol, made from plants such as corn and sugar cane, is not a good replacement for gasoline and provides three reasons of disagreement. The lecturer, nevertheless, explains that ethanol is a good alternative and none of those reasons are convincing.
First, the reading claims that the global warming will not be solved by increasing the use of ethanol fuel since it releases carbon dioxide. Conversely, the lecturer opposes this point by saying that ethanol will not add global warming. According to the professor, even though it is true that ethanol releases carbon dioxide but corn can absorb carbon dioxide as nitrogen. So, this reason is not persuasive enough.
In addition, the article posits that production of ethanol would reduce the amount of plants availabe for uses other fuel. On the other hand, the lecturer argues that it dose not reduce the plants. The professor contends that ethanol made from a part of plant that is not eaten by animals and thus it has no effect on decreasing the amount of plants or animals.
Finally, the passage expresses that ethanol fuel will never be able to compete with gasoline on price. Quite on the contrary, the lecturer emphasizes that it will be able to compete by increasing the production that leads to huge drop on price. We also learn that if ethanol produce 3 times greater than now, the price will be droped by 4 percent and thus it can compete with gasoline on price.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In today’s world, it is more important to work quickly and risk making mistakes than to work slowly and make sure that everything is correct.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- TPO 15 80
- TPO 23 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is impossible to always be completely honest with your friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 53
- TPO 17 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, finally, first, if, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, such as, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 5.04856512141 158% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 7.30242825607 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1235.0 1373.03311258 90% => OK
No of words: 252.0 270.72406181 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90079365079 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.04702891845 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48404774457 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 145.348785872 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539682539683 0.540411800872 100% => OK
syllable_count: 385.2 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1163241495 49.2860985944 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.916666667 110.228320801 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 21.698381199 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.25 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.484076957981 0.272083759551 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164673558859 0.0996497079465 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981133249236 0.0662205650399 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269130491169 0.162205337803 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122021015437 0.0443174109184 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.8541721854 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.2367328918 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 63.6247240618 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.