The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the amount of fish and some different kinds of meat which people in a European country are consumed from 1979 to 2004.
Overall, the consumption of beef and lamb decreased gradually, while there was a significant increase in the figure for chicken. In addition, the consumption of fish is lowest all most time surveyed.
In 1979, the amount of beef which was consumed was highest at about 220 grams per person per week. The figures for chicken and lamp were lower, at under 150 grams and exactly 150 grams respectively while only about 60 grams of fish are consumed.
In the period from 1979 to 2004, the European country saw a dramatic increase in the consumption of chicken, reaching the highest point at around 220 grams in 2004. However, over 50 grams of lamb was consumed, compared to under 50 grams of fish in 2004. There was a steady decline in the consumption of beef, which fell to over 100 grams by the year 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Lovepreet123 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | anasrafiq | 73 | view |
- Sports encourage competition rather than cooperation Therefore sports should not be encouraged at school To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 80
- The users of social media such as Facebook Twitter are replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this way outweigh the disadvantages 76
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68047337278 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46421111165 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508875739645 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.862598724 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.875 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179410297432 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0951444661545 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994748168435 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142309318979 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11735510527 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.