Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
It is true that some country focuses their facilities on training athletes for the global achievements rather than developing citizens. I think the negative of this trend outweigh the positive.
On the one hand, it is understandable why the government should give a priority of infrastructure to the best athletes to obtain good results for the country. The first reason is that the funding spent on sports was limited, which requires the government need to allocate resources in an adequate way for some certain objects. For example, the authority is likely able to invest in an only high standard swimming pool which helps athletes perfect their skills because this construction often cost a lot of money to design and build. Besides the shortage of money, the lack of natural resources could be also considered another reason. In fact, the construction of special areas for athletes would result in the destruction of a vast number of forests to make room for the buildings. In order to preserve the wildlife habitats, there were little natural resources exploited for building facilities. As a result, these facilities can only be used to training athletes.
However, I think this trend is negative for some reasons. Firstly, investing more facilities for dwellers is a good way to reduce the burden on health care. It is true that when citizens are encouraged to take exercises, they can tackle the risk of obesity which significantly contributes to different diseases such as cancer, stroke, and heart attack. This means that the governments would save a lot of money to take care of the public and could use this amount of tax on other sectors of the nation. Besides, it is apparent that the tax is contributed by the community; therefore this funding should be spent to improve people’s life. If all the national resources are strongly emphasis on athletes while numerous of the health problem of citizens are ignored, this would lead to the strong opposition from the public, affecting the security of the nation.
In conclusion, I believe that this tendency is negative and the government should let dwellers use special facilities together with athletes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- Some people say that it is possible for a country to be both economically successful and have a clean environment Others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 86
- In schools and universities girls tend to choose arts while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed 87
- In some countries, the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 78
- The animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land in sea. What are the reasons and solutions? 11
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 283, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an adequate way" with adverb for "adequate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e government need to allocate resources in an adequate way for some certain objects. For example, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 866, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., affecting the security of the nation. In conclusion, I believe that this tende...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as for, for example, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09523809524 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79660981365 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543417366947 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3864650496 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6875 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224523772941 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806806575476 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781106996632 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170973035123 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0643652902679 0.056905535591 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.