The graph shows the unemployment rates in the us and japan between march 1993 and march 1999.
Given is the graph that illustrates how unemployment rates changed in the US and Japan from March 1993 to March 1999. It can be clearly seen that, as the years went by, gap between two countries figures related to this issue closed steadily.
To begin with, on the premise of given time period, in terms of total number of jobless people the US was significantly ahead of Japan (7% vs. 2.5%). From that time on, the amount of unemployed people started to go down gradually and bottomed out in 1998 when the percentages of the unemployed reached to 5% of the whole work force of the country. On the contrary, in Japan joblessness figures went up considerably and hit its peak doubling in 1998 when it met with the figure for the USA.
When it comes to the final year, to be more precise, the year of 1999, both countries almost preserved their unemployment levels at around 5%.
To sum it up, although unemployment problem decreased in essence in the US, it experienced upward trend in Japan.
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 53
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 55
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behavior .Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 78
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 63
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia. Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant. 90
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 7 10
No. of Words: 177 200
No. of Characters: 788 1000
No. of Different Words: 111 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.647 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.452 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.61 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 46 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 35 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 21 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 16 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.286 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.229 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.286 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.428 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.749 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.11 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4