the graph below gives infomation on households with a regular use of a car in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.
The line graph illustrates the percentage of families use car regularly in Great Britain over the period of 26 years.
Overall, the proportion of households using cars increase significantly, specially the use of two cars rise dramatically.
There was a gradual growth in the use of two cars from 8% to 10% between 1971 and 1979, then the figure rise sharply from 10% to 36% over the 22- year period. By contrast, the percentage of families using no car decrease considerably from 58% in 1971 to 40% in 1983 and reached the lowest point of 36% in 2007.
The use of one car fluctuate slightly between 43% and 41 % over the 26-year period. It experienced a leveling out at 2% from 1971 to 1979 and then went up moderately by 5% from 2% in 2979 to 7% in 2007.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-07-16 | yen070998 | 84 | view |
2019-01-19 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 85 | view |
2018-06-13 | www.www | 97 | view |
2017-10-23 | Vuong Linh | 88 | view |
2017-10-23 | Vuong Linh | 65 | view |
- In many countries, there not enough students choosing science subjects in University. Causes and solution. 78
- what are disadvantages and advantages of having older people living in the family home 73
- Leaders and directors in an organisation are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 87
- the pie chart below show units of electricity production by fuel source in australia and france in 1980 and 2000. 56
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, a991 and 2001. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 626.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 139.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5035971223 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43363162301 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69810969354 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575539568345 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 174.6 283.868780488 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.6891789162 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.333333333 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.33333333333 5.23603664747 25% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360971604369 0.215688989381 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.177175320561 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574950594987 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220345839855 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034610705004 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.