Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion?
It is true that wild animals and birds are attracting too much concern and too many resources of community today. Personally, I agree with that idea, however, this trend can bring some advantage and disadvantage to the human being.
On one hand, there are many benefits for people to preserve wild animals and birds due to various reasons. Firstly, protecting wild species is protecting our lives. There is some endangered animal which is on the verge of extinction. Therefore, without money funded and concern of society, those species will die out which has a negative effect on ecological balance. For example, the disappearance of one species will result in a collapse of others and this will affect directly to human being sooner or later. In addition, protecting wild animals and birds is a kind of preserving of beauty and diversity of earth. It is variety of animals which can contribute vastly to scientific research.
On the other hand, paying too much concern and too many resources to preserve wild animals and birds can have some drawbacks. First of all, it is expensive to run the projects which help to protect wilds animals and birds. For example, building research lab to maintain the gene of bird is very expensive and the cost training researchers are highly pricy. Furthermore, poverty, crime, education are likely paid less attention and investment by people if they are focus too much on conserving wild animals and birds which are not really envolving in our life such as wolf, leopard and the like. Thus, instead of giving too many resources to protect wolf which is the enemy of other animals, community can pay attention to the poor people who are really needed to lessen poverty and increase their life
.
Conclusion, although paying too much concern and finances to wild species can bring some positive influence to these animals, it beleive that people should concern about how to reduce the social problems such as poverty reduction, diseases, crime.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Phạm Phú Trường | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | Saeedeamani | 67 | view |
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some people believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and g 85
- Some people think that schools schould reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvement. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 86
- Many schools ask students to evaluate their teachers. Do you think it is a good idea? Give reasons and details to support your idea. 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 525, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uman being sooner or later. In addition, protecting wild animals and birds is a k...
^^
Line 4, column 802, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... lessen poverty and increase their life . Conclusion, although paying too much ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as poverty reduction, diseases, crime.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, really, so, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, kind of, such as, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03333333333 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55915313984 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524242424242 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6656686537 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.733333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8666666667 7.06120827912 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361073707404 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126665235698 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094091424339 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229993893518 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766162135515 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.