“In a war of ideas, it is people who get killed”. Does a common man suffer from a group’s ideology? Express your opinion, and support the same with reasons and examples.
It is a well-known saying and I personally support the statement. Time and again humankind has faced mass destruction owing to the difference in ideas and beliefs. So it is rightly said that group’s ideology can sometimes cause suffering to a common man.
A good example is this regard is September 11, 2001, attack in the US which killed over 2900 people & injured 6000+ people. It caused an infrastructural damage of over $3 trillion. The impact of the attacks affected both society and culture in general. As a result, general public live under constant fear.
The sufferings of common man in such incidences cannot be expressed in words. It has been observed that in the clash of opposing ideas, ideologies, or concepts it is the common man who suffers the most. There are many nations or groups who use ‘war of ideas’ as a tool to promote their interests abroad.
The second example in this regard is of government who sometimes roll out policies which are not in favor of the general public. Despite the negative response from people, such projects find its place in government’s agenda. Such decisions are forced onto the public. Such cases form the perfect example of a common man sufferings from a group’s ideology.
Usually, a group’s ideology is followed by the majority of the population, governments, or other groups who find common concerns and interest as of group. Such groups tend to work towards their member’s betterment and gain. For example, National Organization for Women (NOW) mission is to advocate for equality and full societal participation for women.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | Anand_DD | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-27 | Sidra018 | 80 | view |
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 80
- Some people believe law changes human behaviour. Do you agree/disagree? 77
- Cities are now expanding the government should make a better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership Agree or Disagree 11
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples? 77
- The only thing that interferes with my learning is toy education Einstein What does he mean by that And do you think he is correct 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'infrastructural damage'.
Suggestion: infrastructural damage
...eople & injured 6000+ people. It caused an infrastructural damage of over trillion. The impact of the at...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...caused an infrastructural damage of over trillion. The impact of the attacks affe...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ty and culture in general. As a result, general public live under constant fear. The suffer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 114, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... policies which are not in favor of the general public. Despite the negative response from peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, well, for example, in general, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16349809886 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95173720464 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615969581749 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2468683552 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.8823529412 104.977214359 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4705882353 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41176470588 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 2.75862068966 362% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347584775937 0.242375264174 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0994566969254 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103253545335 0.071462118173 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18183139836 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096394022017 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 53.1260098522 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.