The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
the given pie charts illustrate the percentages of the students of British who had the ability to talk other languages besides Inglish language in 2000 and 2010.
An overall trend, the highest proportion of foreign language for British students who speak it was the Spanish language in 2000. whilst the lowest percentage of foreign language for British students who speak it was German language and two other languages in 2000.
the first highest percentage for spoken foreign languages between British students was the Spanish language (30%) in 2000, which was less than the percentage in 2010 (35%). the second highest proportion was for other languages (20%), which was a half percentage in 2010 (10%). for French languages, the percentage was (15%), (10%) in 2000 and 2010 respectively.
In addition, the British students who spoke German language only were (10%) in 2000 and 2010. Finally, the percentage of British students who talk another language (15%) in 2000, which was a little less than the percentage in 2010 (20%)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 67
- These days many children spend a lot of time playing video games and many parents feel this is very negative. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Nowadays more and more older people who are looking for work have to compete with younger people for the same jobs What problems does this cause What are some possible solutions 78
- Question- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the given pie charts illustrate the percent...
^^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whilst
...ak it was the Spanish language in 2000. whilst the lowest percentage of foreign langua...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...age and two other languages in 2000. the first highest percentage for spoken for...
^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...s less than the percentage in 2010 35%. the second highest proportion was for other...
^^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...hich was a half percentage in 2010 10%. for French languages, the percentage was 15...
^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h languages, the percentage was 15%, 10% in 2000 and 2010 respectively. In addit...
^^
Line 6, column 230, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tle less than the percentage in 2010 20%
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, second, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 853.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10778443114 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5568792158 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413173652695 0.547539520022 75% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9809835562 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.625 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264980750406 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17346695527 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669957349251 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216817523856 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517173573337 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.52 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.