Even though globalization affects the world’s economics in a very positive way, its negative side should not be
forgotten. Discuss.
The last decades have been witnessing a breakthrough in communications and transportations devices which leads to appearance of revolutionary concept “globalization”. As everything else, globalization has its own pros and cones especially towards the economics and financing.
At the beginning, let’s state that, before those advances in economic definitions, local markets in developing countries were manipulated by few punch of monopolists. Nowadays, the economic acts and legislations - that have been raised after development of globalization – enhance the accessibility to those markets. Furthermore competitions between local and international manufacturers suppress the monopoly acts, enrich the quality of products and decline the prices. In addition, a surge of cash flow as result of direct investments of multinational companies in low-income countries has aided those countries’ economies and created new jobs opportunities.
Nonetheless, the mentioned great impacts on economics, globalization has its own drawbacks. Globalization nearly eliminates the nations’ borders, making the world as one unit. Thus, any economic significant slump in single country puts its own mark on the markets of other countries. For instance, the global crises in 2000s, after it had happened in the housing sector in USA, it crossed the oceans to the 4 corners of the world. The chain reactions of such catastrophes expanded to other investments and caused dumping in the developed countries markets, but their effects were dramatic on poor countries.
Eventually, the globalization is an outstanding footprint on the course of developing the human history. Importantly, it’s vital to create laws and acts to protect the international as well the local businesses from the major economic catastrophes. Also, many steps should be taken to protect developing countries from the misuse of multi-national mega corporates.
- Some people feel that entertainers (e.g. film stars, pop musicians or sports stars) are paid too much money.Do you agree or disagree?Which other types of jobs should be highly paid? 89
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large some of money on constructing new railways lines for very fast trains between cities, Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.discuss both t 73
- the maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- Even though globalization affects the world’s economics in a very positive way, its negative side should not beforgotten. Discuss. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly towards the economics and financing. At the beginning, let's state that,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun punch seems to be countable; consider using: 'few punches'.
Suggestion: few punches
...eveloping countries were manipulated by few punch of monopolists. Nowadays, the economic ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...nce the accessibility to those markets. Furthermore competitions between local and internat...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 323, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2000s'.
Suggestion: in the 2000s
...ntries. For instance, the global crises in 2000s, after it had happened in the housing s...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, nonetheless, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1679.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.99642857143 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.67485240738 2.80592935109 131% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7266926324 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.928571429 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176662004651 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621245621718 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390623543294 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107313309618 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304971343304 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.52 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.