The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors' contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie chart provide information about the sectors that have been important to the conomy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.

First of all, as the first chart shows, the agriculture's sector had the highest percentage of contribution with 24% in 2000, whereas the construction's sector represented the lowest percentage with only 3%. However, even several other industry sections contributed to Turkey's economy, such as Healthcare and Education, Trade, Utilities and Transportation, Leisure and Hospitality and Government with 17%, 14%, 17% and 12% respectively. Also Manufacturing and Finance, Business and Other with 8% and 5% gave their contribution.

The second pie chart illustrates how the agriculture's contribution had a fall of 14% in 2016, while Construction, Manufacturing, Trade, Utilities and Trasportation and Finance, Business and Other sectora had a slight increase reaching 10%, 12%,16% and 8% respectively. What emerges is that Government and Leisure and Hospitality experienced a slight decrease of 9% and 14% respectively. In addiction, only Healthcare and Education's section remained stable at 17% in 2016.

Overall, the data indicate how the agriculture had a high role to the economy's development of Turkey in 2000, whereas the Healthcare and Education became the most important sector in 2016.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (56 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-07-29 shubham0708 view
2021-02-17 Shaileshbhai 73 view
2021-06-08 dnnghha 95 view
2021-06-26 Jignesh patel 100 view
2021-07-29 shubham0708 view
Essays by user Elisa90 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'agricultures'' or 'agriculture's'?
Suggestion: agricultures'; agriculture's
...t of all, as the first chart shows, the agricultures sector had the highest percentage of co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'constructions'' or 'construction's'?
Suggestion: constructions'; construction's
...tribution with 24% in 2000, whereas the constructions sector represented the lowest percentag...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 436, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ith 17%, 14%, 17% and 12% respectively. Also Manufacturing and Finance, Business and...
^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'agricultures'' or 'agriculture's'?
Suggestion: agricultures'; agriculture's
...he second pie chart illustrates how the agricultures contribution had a fall of 14% in 2016,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, second, so, whereas, while, such as, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 3.97073170732 403% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1119.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62311557789 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3090137474 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552763819095 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5615016864 43.030603864 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.875 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203906664844 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0895036721869 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.080943333827 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147048615372 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657909392467 0.0819641961636 80% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 61.2550243902 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 11.4329268293 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.