Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree?
In these days it has become a growing trend for students to pursue an education in experimental ways, rather than learning from books. There is a In these days it has become a growing trend for students to pursue an education in experimental ways, rather than learning from books. There is a widespread worry in a society that this would only lead to a myriad of concerns. In my opinion, practical learning is much more effective compared to learning from the books. This essay will discuss both the aspects of this argument and why I am in favor of learning through experiments.
There is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that teaching with experiments will make the students learn in a more interactive way. Not only this will make the students grasp the subject effectively, but it will also make the students to remember the learnings for a longer period. For example, take the students to a car factory, and show that how a car will be assembled, instead of writing the steps on a whiteboard. By doing so, students will remember the procedure their lifetime.
However, on the other hand, there are few limitations associated with practical learning. There are few subjects like social studies, history of kings, which involves a lot of content, so these will be more effective when we read the books. Hence it is apparent that why some students feel that learning from books is also important in a formal education.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that there are both benefits and drawbacks associated with learning methods. But I am of the opinion that if students choose the learning methods suitable for the learning method, it will be more effective.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Learn from personal experience works better than formal education. 55
- How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause? 70
- What are the benefits of living in big cities, as opposed to rural areas? What are the problems of rural areas and how can they be solved? 72
- Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to? 87
- Importance of involving employees in important decisions. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ther than learning from books. There is a In these days it has become a growing t...
^
Line 5, column 242, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... more effective when we read the books. Hence it is apparent that why some students f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83501683502 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69084454748 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481481481481 0.580463131201 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.9976244238 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.7333333333 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128351744817 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0479364195795 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473207775206 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.084742533187 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344879686201 0.0609392437508 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.5310837438 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.