The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The three pie chart illustrates the percantage of yearly expenditure by a british school in the period of 1981,1991 and 2000.
Overall, the highest percentage money spent on teachers salaries while lowest proportion of money spent on insuracce in both three years.
In 1981 the UK school 40% money spend for teachers salaries and it was increased to 50% in 1991. In 2001, the percentage was slightly decreased which was 45%, which was 5% higher than in 1991. In the UK school 15% money spend on resources and books which was 5% increased in 1991 and significantly decline in 2001 which was 20% and 9 % respectively. The least amount money spent on insurance was 2 % in 1981. It gradually increased to 3% in 1991 and rose to 8% in 2011.
In the UK school 28% money spend on other workers salaries which was the second highest money spent in 1981 and it was decreased to 22% in 1991. Then it was significantly decline to 15% in 2001. The money spent om furtniture and equipment was 15% in 1981 and it decline to 5% in 1991. In 2001, it was spent to 23% which was higher than other two period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 72
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the green house gas emissions which result from this energy use. 67
- The table below describes the number of employees and factories in England and Wales from 1851 to 1901. 67
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'while the lowest'.
Suggestion: while the lowest
...entage money spent on teachers salaries while lowest proportion of money spent on insuracce ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 194, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... 45%, which was 5% higher than in 1991. In the UK school 15% money spend on resour...
^^
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to 3% in 1991 and rose to 8% in 2011. In the UK school 28% money spend on othe...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'declined'.
Suggestion: declined
... 22% in 1991. Then it was significantly decline to 15% in 2001. The money spent om fur...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 1991. Then it was significantly decline to 15% in 2001. The money spent om furtn...
^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... money spent om furtniture and equipment was 15% in 1981 and it decline to 5% in ...
^^
Line 7, column 265, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'declines'?
Suggestion: declines
...e and equipment was 15% in 1981 and it decline to 5% in 1991. In 2001, it was spent to...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 349, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'period' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'periods'.
Suggestion: periods
... to 23% which was higher than other two period.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.52763819095 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56723167021 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.427135678392 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.745195597 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9090909091 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224053162824 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114129526104 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820249180147 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162663650769 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926687274292 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 87.05 61.2550243902 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.3012195122 54% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.