Some people think that universities and colleges should concentrate on the history of their own country rather than the history of other parts of the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Educational institutions around the world have debated the importance of studying history. Some believe learning their own nation`s history is sufficient, personally, I strongly disagree. This essay will argue the importance of studying world`s history with examples from the UCLA university and the Industrial Revolution to prove points and demonstrate arguments.
On the one hand, there is ample evidence suggests that there are lots of benefit from learning historical events happened in the world. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly world history is a subject embraces all humanity, not just certain nations, ethnic groups, or civilizations. Secondly, it gives attention to common problems and challenges that humans have shared, rather than focusing on one country. For example, recent empirical research from UCLA demonstrated that learning world history helps to broaden student`s knowledge. Therefore it is conclusively clear the world`s history education has more benefit than national history.
On the other hand, although there is a case for studying world’s history, the impact of understanding historical events of a nation cannot be overstated. This is largely because students will learn the sacrifices made by their ancestors and learn to respect their own culture and traditions. For example, if Americans history student`s fail to learn to the Industrial Revolution, the majority would miss the valuable lessons it teaches. Thus, it is possible to state beyond doubt that studying own history has its benefits too.
From the arguments and examples given, I firmly believe studying world history has more advantages than national history. It is predicted that all institutes will give more emphasis to world history in future.
- The diagram below shows how coffee beans are processed.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life. How widespread is the problem?. What the problem this shortage of time cause? 88
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change? 80
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic, why?. What are the advantages and disadvantages of cashless society. 80
- Besides a lot of advantages, some people believe that the internet creates many problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 555, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...s to broaden student's knowledge. Therefore it is conclusively clear the world&apos...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 199, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ill give more emphasis to world history in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72284644195 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97606964965 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576779026217 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9734750455 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2302624399 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878182462716 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399358245769 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15541839313 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226299385062 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.