"More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of widespread online information and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that an electronic version of books might be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that reinforcing e-book market can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, developing e-book applications can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that lower prices, as well as easy accessibility, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of unprintable versions of publications on environment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both reducing the influence of ordinary books and public libraries apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, a significant expansion of electronic documents might increase the consequences of making libraries useless. Moreover, fundamental aspects of such influence relate to this reality that the demerits of spending more money on printed books pertain to waste of money. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of purchasable paper books is correlated negatively with e-book publishers. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of establishing more bookstore websites.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of electronic libraries far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of online publications prove the significance of e-book collections, but also pinpoint practical implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-26 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-20 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | English time | 77 | view |
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 77
- Can the Internet replace the classroom teacher? Discuss your views. 77
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion. 88
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education, agree or disagree? Or Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree. 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84558823529 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36327741171 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650735294118 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7801931552 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.5 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143986734624 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482299537567 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0304875757587 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809280446698 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142805463985 0.0609392437508 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.95 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.