Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spent solving immediate problems here on Earth.
Recently, the phenomenon of space exploration and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the aerospace industry might be highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that space technological developments can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, investment in space exploration projects can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that doing outer space research, as well as expanding human knowledge, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the importance of space expeditions in broadening human's horizons. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both understanding the universe and searching for aliens apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, pouring money into exploration mission might increase the consequences of inadequate resources for our immediate problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of wasting time and money could relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of economic resources lead to poverty. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creating space shuttles is correlated negatively with enormous profits for nations. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of human primary needs.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that space exploration budget far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of such concept prove the significance of discovering unexplored planets, but also pinpoint future of space missions implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-25 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kbalavenka | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Maheswari | 77 | view |
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additional funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. 80
- "More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement? 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 77
- Some people believe that exploring outer space is important because it expands human knowledge and might lead to discoveries that will benefit humanity in the future. Other people believe that space exploration is a waste of money that could be better spe 77
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77536231884 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24157739173 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670289855072 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.045115759 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.833333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29922710836 0.242375264174 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897156740493 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506453060715 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157043725385 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252602570912 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.41 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.