The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in 2010. However, across the two years, the pattern differs before and after the...
^^
Line 5, column 67, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... -50 afe group made charitable donations ,and this figure is the highest on the ch...
^^
Line 5, column 113, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...this figure is the highest on the chart.The 18 -25s contributed the least at only 1...
^^^
Line 5, column 158, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...8 -25s contributed the least at only 17% .By 2010, these figures had fallen signif...
^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...-25s contributed the least at only 17% .By 2010, these figures had fallen signific...
^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ignificantly to 35% and 7% respectively.The level of donations from the 26-35 age g...
^^^
Line 7, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...he 51-65 age group from 35% to nearly40% , which was the highest percentage for 20...
^^
Line 7, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ich was the highest percentage for 2010.The figure for the over 65s was lower than ...
^^^
Line 7, column 225, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the over 65s was lower than this, at 35% , but it was still a little higher than t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 735.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62264150943 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53942335221 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 111.21690519 43.030603864 258% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 147.0 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.8 22.9334400587 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6 5.23603664747 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15123162915 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105201352739 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773671656366 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109380037189 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517441626531 0.0819641961636 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.11 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.