The chart below show information about consumer decision regarding mobile phone purchases in two different countries.
The present charts provide some data related to critical items in selecting mobile phone by people of two different countries which are named A and B. These mentioned factors includes price, design, friend recommendations and something else that are not indicated. Comparison between country A and B shows that the first important factor for choosing phone is different among people.
In country A, the most important item that people consider is price. In fact, for half of the people price is the first vital factor which can affect their choice. The second item is friend’s recommendations. As it can be seen, about 33 percent of people care about what their friends tell about one products.
On the other hand, in country B, design is the first concern of people who are going to buy a new phone. According to chart, about 40 percent of people have expresses that the design is their first priority. The noticeable point is that the percentage of people who pay attention to friends recommendations is close to people of country A.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-02 | ALI SAQLAIN ZAHID | 67 | view |
- You have heard that a developer plans to build a shopping centre near your home Write a letter to the council In your letter say how you heard about the plan explain how you feel about it ask for more information about it 73
- You recently travelled with a certain airline Write a letter to the manager about your experience Please say Where and when did you travel What did you like or dislike What can you suggest for improvement 75
- Some people are born to be leaders while others believe leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give opinion 56
- The diagram below shows the process of recycling glass bottles 43
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997to 2010. 91
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to phone'
Suggestion: to phone
...the first important factor for choosing phone is different among people. In countr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one product', 'a product', or simply 'products'?
Suggestion: one product; a product; products
...are about what their friends tell about one products. On the other hand, in country B, de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dations is close to people of country A.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 873.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96022727273 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74623497901 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4789009969 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133772541308 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054583257035 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655509844901 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992922737828 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611502563128 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.