Some people think that people who chose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is true that some employees believe that commiting with one career path is the best way to gain advantages rather than regularly switching jobs. Personally, I agree with this perspective. The reasons for it are twofold.
On the one hand, there is a variety of reasons why staffs have a tendency of choosing to seek for new jobs. Firstly, it gives workers an easier access to master a wide range of vital soft skills. In deeds, the more job seekers start new jobs, the more different skills their learn from various working environments. For instance, some financial analysits who are extremely professional at analysing financial statements and economic trends, may find it interesting to learn presentation skill when they move to be spellbinders. Secondly, a number of seniors find suitable paths after failing at serveral first jobs. Let’s take a Vietnamese businessman – Quoc Anh as a telling example, not until the age of over 40, after leaving some positions as manufactoring managers in many factories, did he become succesfull with starting-up a retail outlets chain.
One the other hand, I believe that staying long in the same sector is beneficial in some ways. Initially, staffs are bestowed upon the chances to get fast-tracked promotion in their career laders. Nowhere are emplyees highly appriciated than long periods of dedication for the thriving of the organizations. Besides, they also earn bigger remuneration package to meet their needs such as luxurious cars or houses. Further more, commiting with a job is conducive to strengthening the brandnames of employees. Irfferutably, on the ground of deeply understading about the companies they work for, staffs thoroughly aware of strengths and defficiencies of the businesses. Thus, not only could they contribute valuable ideas to improve the productivity but they also give brith of crucious advice to enhance companies’ competitive advances. As a result, they mark themselve on other’s respect, leading to increase their job satisfaction.
By the way of conclusion, although switching jobs time by time can be advantageous in their own ways, it seems to me that developing career path in the same sector is by no means less beneficial.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-14 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-31 | PHẠM THẢO | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-16 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | Blackcytrus | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-29 | Blackcytrus | 78 | view |
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 61
- Buying things on the Internet, such as books, air tickets and groceries, is becoming more and more popular.Do the advantages of shopping in this way outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... highly appriciated than long periods of dedication for the thriving of the organ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, as to, for instance, such as, as a result, by the way, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1877.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27247191011 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08437071323 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640449438202 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 574.2 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3762611603 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.277777778 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108041154338 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312311428803 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0276586057589 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0641436473365 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247043960964 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.