Does the advent of internet change the role of teacher? To what extent do you agree?
Knowledge is the only thing that cannot be stolen. Some people believe that internet has changed the education system and current learning techniques. I also agree with this statement in to some extent and here I'm going to elaborate my opinions on above matter.
To begin with, few decades ago teachers were the main resource for students to acquire knowledge. Apart from the books, students always have to depend on the teachers to solve or clarify issues. After invention of the internet all systems have turned upside down. This is mainly because many students are now interested in self studying and even schools are promoting it. Surprisingly, books also out of date now. Students are preferred to refer internet rather than reading pages and pages. It is obvious that the role of teacher has changed because of the internet in some countries especially in developed countries that has the internet and computer facilities.
In contrast, we have to accept the fact that, the role of teacher cannot replaced by internet. It is a well known factor that, book knowledge is not sufficient for students to survive in the competitive society. They also have to teach practical skills like respecting each other, patience, team working etc. Teachers are the ones who shaped students with all these qualities. For an example, anyone can be the batch top or the class first but they cannot be humble human beings without the proper guidance of a teacher.
To conclude based on the above mentioned factors I believe that internet has changed the role of teacher but we still need teachers in schools as internet cannot creates a man with good and practical qualities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | richierich25 | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | maniram vicky | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Roshanip | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Roshanip | 55 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Roshanip | 61 | view |
- Medical technology has increased average life expectancy. Is it curse or blessing? 55
- Computer technology has had more of a negative than a positive impact on societyHow far do you agree with this statement? Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience. 77
- Environmental problems are too serious for individuals to solve and only big companies/governments can solve them. Do you agree or disagree 77
- Schools should prepare students for university. rather than for work,'How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 77
- Travelling to study is over-rated. We have brilliant scholars who studied locally. Is travel really necessary for tertiary studies? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...is statement in to some extent and here Im going to elaborate my opinions on above...
^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he teachers to solve or clarify issues. After invention of the internet all systems h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, well, apart from, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53697772633 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59126984127 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0594288544 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227004769138 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693876761222 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729974266757 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144640069944 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457244265561 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.