Medical technology has increased average life expectancy. Is it curse or blessing?
In the modernized world the average life expectancy of a human is in between 75-80 years which is much higher than the past. Some people believe that the increment in average life expectancy is a bless while others argue that it is really a burden to the world. Here I’m going to elaborate my opinions on above matter and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with few decades ago the average human life expectancy was nearly 60-65 years which was much lower than now. It is a well -known factor that the main reason for this increment is the advance development in medical technologies. For example, in 19th century many people had died because of several illnesses such as malaria. But most of those health issues were disappeared from the world as a result of dedicated researchers. On the other hand, some people complain that high life expectancy is a burden to the world. This directly increases the world population. Meanwhile the higher number of elder populations add nothing to the economy but only a cost. Hence, most countries are now in a serious problem of maintaining this increasing population.
In addition, older people are asserts to any country. This is because they are the knowledgeable resource people who can share those valuable ideas with the younger generations. Their life experiences are more valuable than any book in libraries. Those experiences are full with practical situations that no one can acquire that knowledge by reading thousands of books.
To conclude, based on the above mention factors increasing elder population is becoming a problem but, each country needs to take the maximum advantages of their older people without considering them as a burden.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...increment in average life expectancy is a bless while others argue that it is really a ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...irectly increases the world population. Meanwhile the higher number of elder populations ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, really, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04210526316 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71448357015 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575438596491 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.067295221 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8125 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9375 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146916475521 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0447820835156 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479326869919 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0809534958095 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514326358521 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.