Nowadays families move to different countries for work. Some people think it has a negative effect on children, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Family migration has been exceeding rapidly than before. It is often argued by some that would be adversely affect on children, while, others disagree and depicts that which would enhance the well being as a whole. However, in my opinion, moving other countries for job would be better for forthcoming generation in terms of education, cultural amalgamation and broad minded personality.
On the one hand, people explain the consequences of migration in children behaviour such as cultural diversity and language barriers. In brief, pupils who went outside country for long period may interact with other nationalities with different culture would lead to difficulty to distinguish which is good or bad. Secondly, language makes another problem to communicate each other and may psychologically affected to non expressive feelings on children. For instance, students from international school facing many difficulties related to race distinguish and fundamentalism in some countries of the world.
On the other hand, assimilation of various cultural aspects in the early ages would flourish the humanity and equality. In other words, children who interact with other nationality and culture would influence the attitude towards others and make them to respect and value others. For examples, children from migrant working parents seems to get opportunity to mingle with others often thrive to be broad minded and empathetic to all without national boundaries Moreover, children often get good education and academic carrier from other countries that may sometimes absent in born country by the fact of poverty and non availability. Innovative technology and modern study materials would have affect the betterment of studies and carrier in some extent.
To sum up, transfer to other countries as per the job opportunity would have some adverse effect on children. Nevertheless, in my perspective, other factors like educational and carrier opportunities in future would have give plenty of chances to the children and next generation and humanitarian nature to the core.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-08 | Chinkiarora | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | manvee | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | manvee | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-12 | drtruong92 | 67 | view |
| 2018-08-11 | eyraen | 78 | view |
- The diagram details the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table below shows the production of carbon d Nkioxide in five different countries in 2006 67
- the table below shows the population of three cities in 1990 the population forcast for 2000 and the actual 2000
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree 61
- The table below shows the level of people specialists in various kinds of enterprises in 1990 2000and 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... argued by some that would be adversely affect on children, while, others disagree and de...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...behaviour such as cultural diversity and language barriers. In brief, pupils who ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in brief, such as, in my opinion, in other words, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1763.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56151419558 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95554473044 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570977917981 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6527697547 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.615384615 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.0 7.06120827912 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237487610994 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856451894274 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417414716754 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151376422814 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136490270594 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.