As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of human to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
In recent age, evolution in technology and its use in day to day life is considerably increasing.
And abundant thinking is involed in evolution of technology. Thinking plays vital role in its creating, maintanance
and advancement. But overuse or negative use of technology make human to get habituated with it and obviously
resulting in exacerbating his ability of thinking.
Root cause of technology is humans necessity that stimulates human to think out of the box
and develop a solution. For an example, without invention of transportation, it was not possible for human
to transit. In this case, transportation technology does not create any negative brunt on human thinking.
Similarly, in building architecture field , technology saves lots of time and labour work in construction.
Contrary to that, in computer field, as much as human rely on computer, he is getting more but at a cost of
impairment of his brain. Memory power of human is plummeted as compared to those of not having such technology.
Excessive use of computer specially for entertainment rather than learning really hindered human to think.
Conclusively, all depedns on way of using technology. Stduents ameliorate thinking process using internet
technology in good way. Oppositely, people using same as source fun, are getting dumb day by day.
- Truth is always bitter. 16
- School policies should be based as much on what employers want as well as what students and teachers want. 66
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world.Why is this?What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy? 73
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. 16
- The following appeared as part of a recommendation made by a faculty member to the president of a large university."Never once in our 150-year history as a university have we clarified our objectives. How, then, can we hope to adapt as aninstitution to th 23
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... vital role in its creating, maintanance and advancement. But overuse or negative...
^^^
Line 6, column 91, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stimulates human to think out of the box and develop a solution. For an example, ...
^^^
Line 9, column 42, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...imilarly, in building architecture field , technology saves lots of time and labou...
^^
Line 14, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eliorate thinking process using internet technology in good way. Oppositely, peop...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, really, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 12.4196629213 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 33.0505617978 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 2235.4752809 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 210.0 442.535393258 47% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40952380952 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 4.55969084622 83% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18220242205 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 215.323595506 62% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638095238095 0.4932671777 129% => OK
syllable_count: 364.5 704.065955056 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1777355484 60.3974514979 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.1428571429 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.14285714286 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 4.97078651685 262% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248814978526 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756166065184 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442210126336 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810985058415 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439376165639 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.