More and more people buy and use their own car. Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh its disadvantages for the environment?
In contemporary life, owning and utilizing private cars has become a prevalent and publicly recognized phenomenon. Although some people think that the use of their cars enhances their life, I argue that it compromises the environmentally sustainable development more than any personal benefits.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that having a car makes a great contribution to be time-saving and minimize heavy traffic. Firstly, people are able to reduce abundant bus-waiting time. In fact, if they do not possess a car, they may wait 5 or 10 minutes in the bus stop, and have to stand in line to get on the public transportations such as buses, trains. As the result, the time for communicating to workplaces is long lasting, and then heavy-workload solving time, as well as work productivity, comes at the expense. Secondly, drivers in private cars have an ability to navigate routes and drive in flat ways when they encounter the traffic congestion. Meaning that they could commute to their workplaces promptly, punctually despite such the traffic jam.
Although private cars could bring several personal merits, I suppose its returns in the sustainability of key environmental elements such as natural resources, and the air needs deliberating thoroughly. Regarding the disadvantage for fossil fuel, as to meet the enormous demands for operating an increasing number of cars, people have to exploit gas, oil and other traditional resources which require the millions year in order to recover. Meaning that they put conventional resources at a great risk of depletion, and other fields such as trading, delivery. Moreover, frequent car use realizes the amount of carbon footprint which is one of the primary aspect leading to air pollution. For example, according to the Vietnam newspaper, the rate of pure air in Hanoi, the capital decrease since this country had exported more cars from foreign countries,
In my conclusion, private cars play an indispensable role in our life, yet that it causes environmental degradation is outstripped
- Both governments and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society what extend do you agree or disagree 70
- More and more people buy and use their own car Do you think the advantages of this trend for individuals outweigh its disadvantages for the environment 50
- In countries where there is a high rate of unemployment most pupils should be offered only primary education There is no point in offering secondary education to those who have no hope of finding a job To what extent do you agree or disagree with this sta 85
- In some countries, an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is, therefore, necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 405, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'millions'' or 'million's'?
Suggestion: millions'; million's
...traditional resources which require the millions year in order to recover. Meaning that ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, well, as to, for example, i suppose, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1722.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26605504587 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08092403088 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626911314985 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0800255281 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.461538462 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1538461538 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0769230769 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220074607177 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0653915630801 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559802439419 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12132521168 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0726930188099 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.