It is believed that culture and tradition are lost when it is exposed for earning money. However, others believe it important part of promotion. Discuss and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

It is believed that culture and tradition are lost when it is exposed for earning money. However, others believe it important part of promotion. Discuss and give your opinion.

Over exposure of culture and tradition has been escalating rapidly. However, many believe that, which would be detrimental impacts like lost of real value when it is depicts for money purpose. While, some others argued that, such things are essential part of promotion. At once, in my opinion, primitive cultures and traditions would be burgeoning by the promotion shows rather than declining.

On the one hand, missing of exact strategy of real culture and customs by people who are doing reckless attitude on shows and concentrate only for getting money. In brief, cultural event organisations and traditional show performers mostly changing the character based on their artistic value. Most probably, many unauthentic artists may misuse the behavior for the sustainability of works and followed by financial point of view. For instance, the fund rising competition held on Malaysia makes a controversial issue on news such as, which inhibit their local culture and real custom to some extent. Moreover, artificial changes on tradition would have influence of modernization like new generation mixing on the reality for the viewership and money matter.

On the other hand, exposure of national historic culture and precedence to the world would enhance the power and progress in terms of cultural and traditional diversity. Promotion of local customs to the foreigners would lead to tourism development and economic power. Make use of attractive thinks regarding belief and practice would mitigate the discrimination of nationality and thereby emerging the closeness and relationship irrespective of diversities. However, earning money by such shows or exhibitions may distribute to support or protection of actual programs. For example, in India, Ayurvedic treatment evolved in their local history like cung fou practice from Japan would interconnected to many countries by the promotion work and shows that would be livelihood of many.

To conclude, although, there would be some reduction in culture and tradition seem to use in money purpose, such programs have tremendous benefit for overwhelming growth. Since, in my perspective, having money from the cultural and traditional practice would have advantageous for many developing countries.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-09-22 eyraen 78 view
2018-08-01 Tasthesummoner 61 view
2018-08-01 Tasthesummoner 70 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f diversities. However, earning money by such shows or exhibitions may distribute...
^^
Line 5, column 669, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eir local history like cung fou practice from Japan would interconnected to many...
^^
Line 5, column 681, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...story like cung fou practice from Japan would interconnected to many countries b...
^^
Line 5, column 689, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'interconnect'
Suggestion: interconnect
...ke cung fou practice from Japan would interconnected to many countries by the promotion work...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, while, for example, for instance, in brief, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58309037901 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96380314155 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586005830904 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 601.2 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6101812188 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6875 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244554689012 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818660161702 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542007279848 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160915926019 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0753930035744 0.056905535591 132% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.2 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.