For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Experts throughout the developing and developed countries have debated whether teachers or parents have a stronger impact on the intelligence and social development of school children. This essay will discuss both sides using examples from the Journal of Cognitive Development and the UK government to demonstrate points and prove arguments.
On the one hand, there is ample evidence that parents strongly impact the development of a school child’s basic social and intellectual abilities. The central reason behind this is twofold, firstly kids spend most of their time in the house with their parents, in consequence, a major part of their social skills are contributed to interacting only with their parents. Secondly, kids copy their parents’ way of critical thinking, since they see their parents as perfect examples for them to follow. For example, recent empirical research by the Journal of Cognitive Development demonstrated a strong positive correlation between school kids psychometric performance along with social skills and the academic background and sociability of their parents.Therefore, it is conclusively clear that parents play a key role in developing their child’s social and intellectual abilities.
However, although it is undeniable that parents contribute greatly to their children’s mental progression, teachers are the ones who can make school children excel in their intellectual and social capabilities. This is largely because of the high level of experience tutors have in this field, as they can use several methods to enrich and develop a child’s mind, such as using games which enhance problem solving behavior skills, and plan activities that require kids to work as team, in turn improving their social skills. For instance, an extensive study by the UK government showed that over 90% of the kids whom were homeschooled were 6 points lower in IQ than their peers and, furthermore, about 20% of the students demonstrated very low levels of social skills. Thus it is possible to say beyond doubt that tutors are extremely abundant for a child’s mental and social development.
From the arguments and examples given I firmly believe that parents have abundant contribution in developing a school child’s intellect and social ability, but even so, teachers overall impact still seems to be greater. It is predicted that teachers will have even more significant role in nurturing school children’s mental abilities in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-20 | thanhtam2709 | 89 | view |
- Some people say that computers can translate languages so children need not study foreign languages anymore To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 93
- Some people think that schools have to be more entertaining, while others think that their sole purpose is to educate.Which do you agree with?Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 78
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 763, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...ground and sociability of their parents.Therefore, it is conclusively clear that parents ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...;s social and intellectual abilities. However, although it is undeniable that ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 780, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rated very low levels of social skills. Thus it is possible to say beyond doubt that...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, thus, even so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2142.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59268929504 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10453416398 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548302872063 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 640.8 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.1910518951 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 178.5 106.682146367 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.9166666667 20.7667163134 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403113768927 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156056382866 0.084324248473 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0877471756964 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235771512498 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074333921784 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.9 13.0946893788 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.