The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparions where relevant.
At glance at the line graph provided illutrasted the three types of materials that contributed to air pollution in the UK during the period between 1990 and 2005.
Overall, it is undeniable that there was a considerable decline in total air pollutants in the UK over the period of 15 years.
In the begining of the graph, the figure of pollutant from industry decreased gradually from approximately 5.5 million tons to 3 million tons between 1990 and 2005. In addition, one contributing factor for air pollution in the UK was transport. This number varied slightly, around 1 million tons in the same time. In terms of household, it also caused UK air pollution with the lowest figure in three air pollutants, under 1 million tons from 1990 and 2005.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-08-14 | JennieD | 73 | view |
2019-07-02 | elteembored | 67 | view |
2019-03-29 | thuyduong896 | 73 | view |
2019-01-09 | phuong cao | 89 | view |
2018-12-10 | goodtime | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the information about international conferences in three capital in 1980-2010. 67
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 73
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparions where relevant. 56
- The diagram below shows how the Australian Bureau of Meteorology collects up-to-the-minute information on the weather in order to produce reliable forecasts. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 625.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 129.0 196.424390244 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84496124031 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.37013600491 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78806939111 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 73.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565891472868 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 182.7 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7918274528 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.166666667 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24745264899 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125698519631 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656688277112 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159710191362 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0445811364676 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.