The expression "Never, never give up" means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The one quality that links many successful people is perserverence--tackling one challenge after another is the only way to succeed. However, there are also many driven individuals that fail to achieve their goals. I believe the aforementioned expression can be useful for talented individuals, but one should also know when to give up.
It takes a lot of work to succeed in your field of interest. As a scientist, I spent hundreds of hours studying in the library to even enter the field. After that, it took me months of hard work before I could publish my first research article. Other areas, such as music or dance, demand even more from their practitioners than science. It is inevitable that the daily grind will sooner or later make the aspiring artist or scientist lose their motivation to work. In that case, having a strong motto that will help them get through difficult times is immensely helpful.
On the other hand, the ability to recognize when to stop is also important. For instance, I am terrible at sports, therefore, following the advice "Never, ever give up" would only lead to disappointment. Others fail at studying for long periods of time or following the tempo when playing a musical instrument. Even if they are truly passionate about something, it unfortunately does not mean they are talented in that area. Hence, people should be careful about never giving up if they fail persistently. The advice will only work if you pursue your talents.
In summary, being able to perservere in difficult times is a vital quality for successful individuals. However, blindy pursuing the things you are passionate about with no regard to your talents does not automatically make you succeed. One should find the area they are truly talented in and then "never, never give up" until they succeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-08 | sevvaldemic | 76 | view |
| 2019-05-07 | skykash11 | 66 | view |
| 2019-05-01 | edsonsimoes | 60 | view |
| 2019-04-28 | luoluomelody | 60 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | Molly MEI | 90 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- The expression "Never, never give up" means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 87
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, then, therefore, for instance, in summary, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1538.0 1977.66487455 78% => OK
No of words: 305.0 407.700716846 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04262295082 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92585799175 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 618.680645161 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0442621681 48.9658058833 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.4444444444 100.406767564 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.6045352989 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244862213489 0.236089414692 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675910215515 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744136704431 0.0737576698707 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144719087326 0.150856017488 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0863348962015 0.0645574589148 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 58.1214874552 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 10.9000537634 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.