The bar chart shows the scores of teams A, B and C over 4 different seasons.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart compares team A, B and by scores in 4 different seasons from 2002 to 2005.
Overall, the scores of 3 teams fluctuated over 4 seasons and team B remained on the first place in all seasons.
In 2002, the scores of team B was the highest in 3 teams and in 4 seasons of 82 points, this number was far higher than team C and team A with 10 points and 5 points, respectively. The gaps between team B and team A and team C was contracted in 2003 with 60 points for team B, 15 points and 11 points for team C and A.
2004 witnessed a significant increase in scores of team A to a peak of 35 points, which impressively shorten the interval between team A and team B to about 8 points. With the points of 43 points, team B was the champion and came in the third place was team C with 12 points.
In 2005, the scores of team A sharply fell to 8 points which led to second place, team B steadily kept the highest points of 55 points and the last was team C with the lowest scores in 4 year of 5 points.
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 47
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status. 56
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below give information about the people use public library and the main reasons to visit in Britain in 1991 and 2000 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, third, in the third place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 814.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 3.97073170732 4.92477711251 81% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.342804494 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424390243902 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.0 1.45097560976 69% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 39.500452077 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1611512572 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114065356343 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496443537541 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132860846585 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459090133641 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 92.8 61.2550243902 151% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 6.34 11.4140731707 56% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.