TPO22-teachers should not make their political and social point of views known to students
Throughout history, teachers have been known as second parents of children. In fact, students spend a lot of time with their teachers at school, and they are certainly affected by them. Children often try to follow their teachers' steps, and sometimes they take their teachers as a good example for their future life. One of the heated debates on this realm is that whether teachers should indicate either their social or their political view to students. However, there might be some counterexamples about this claim I would argue that teachers should act, talk, and behave objectively without any particular view. Following reasons will further elaborate on this issue.
The first prominent point to be mentioned is that teachers as role models have a profound impact on several aspects of students' lifestyle. Consequently, if they express their ideas about a specific social or political issue, intentionally or unintentionally, they would alter their students' mind since children are not mature enough to form their own opinions about abstract concepts. Obviously, neither parents nor teachers must inject their own ideas into children's brain even if they think children are not capable of making good decisions about social and political issues. Besides, teachers might give rise to the conflicts between parents and their children by expressing their own points of view about both social and political issues.
The second rationale behind my idea is rooted in the fact that teachers must draw the line between their professional life and their personal life. In general words Teachers’ personal life, ideas, and views must be considered a red line which should not be crossed by the students. Rarely do children obey their teachers when they know many things about them. Consider my own experience as an example which can shed some light on this issue. A few years ago, I was supposed to teach adolescent students for the first time. Since it was my first experience of teaching, I talked about the sexual harassment and its following consequences with my students. Unfortunately, they were not ready to get that information, they became rude, and this conversation destroyed our relationship. Draw on my experience, I have learned that I should not make my views about different issues known for all students to attract respect.
To wrap it up, based on the ideas which were presented above, I highly believe that teachers should avoid sharing their social or political views with their students. Therefore, they would give their students a chance to shape their own opinions without being influenced by other people.
- TPO22_Integerated 85
- TPO26 – Independent: A/D? It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parent's jobs than to choose jobs that very different from their parent's job. 80
- TPO43 85
- TPO21 – Independent: A/D? For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 83
- People benefit more from travelling in their own country than from travelling to foreign countries. 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 9.8082437276 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2216.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 424.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22641509434 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53775939005 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67683172581 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521226415094 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4523877365 48.9658058833 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.8 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.6045352989 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41911315033 0.236089414692 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132612039667 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968175984043 0.0737576698707 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29013630743 0.150856017488 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064108442865 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.