Technology desighed to make people's lives simpler actually makes people's livies more complicated
Currently, with the advancement in technology, there is an increasing number of people attaching more importance to the upgraded technology, some of them even expend lots of money to catch up with the trend of high-tech. While a bunch of individuals are reluctant to follow the trend since they reckon that technology makes their lives more complex, which does not benefit them. Personally speaking, I contend that technology does simplify our lives and there are a couple of reasons to account for my view.
To start with, the technology enhances our production efficiency. To be more specific, with the advent of technology, individuals from all walks of lives are equipped with advanced technology, like computers, media and so on. Therefore, individuals’ productive efficiency is largely promoted. For instance, Rebecca, one of my best friends, who now work in an enterprise listed in fortune 500, offer brings a laptop with her. The initial reason for bringing a laptop is that such kind of technology enables her to cope with any problems emerging in her works, which apparently reduces the time spent on the commuting and elevates the efficiency. In addition, helped by varieties of software installed in the laptop, she is capable of displaying their work more vividly and getting the point across in a short time. For example, she usually makes power points to explain their project plans to their customers. This example illuminates that the technology boosts our efficiency through cutting time spent on needless affairs.
What’s more, the technology also contributes to the upgrade of our lives. Owing to the engineers’ creative ideas, the number of newly-emerging products is ever-rising, which affords customers with multiple choices of appliances, like a dishes-washing machine or sweeping machine. Hence, individuals with these machines are capable of spending the time saved by the state-of-the-art technology to refresh themselves. In addition, the emergence of e-commerce also ensures that individuals can purchase commodities from all over the world at a click of a mouse, instead of traveling there with a huge cost. The research conducted to evaluate people’s willingness to utilize the advanced technology demonstrates that 78% of individuals are likely to purchase these products due to its effect on facilitating their lives in different aspects. Those people who harbor the conservatory ideas toward these products are merely for the sake of costs, instead of casting doubts on its function on easing their lives, which obviously verifies that the technology renders individuals with a lot of conveniences.
Admittedly, some technology cannot be utilized with the knowledge accumulated before, however, it is easy to handle these problems by having a glimpse of the instruction since engineers are updating the technology to enhance customers’ feeling of using. Consequently, the technology will not impose more burden on users and its disadvantage s are compensated by its diversified perks.
In a nutshell, technology has exerted advantageous effects on individuals’ lives since it not only elevates the efficiency of production but also facilitates people’s daily lives.
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement:It it better to spend money on travelling and vacation than save money for the future. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement : Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 90
- should we tell the mistakes to teachers and when should we tell them 67
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea? 73
- Factors influencing making major purchase 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 93.0 52.1666666667 178% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2742.0 1977.66487455 139% => OK
No of words: 497.0 407.700716846 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51710261569 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72159896747 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20219036485 2.67179642975 120% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 212.727598566 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543259557344 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 869.4 618.680645161 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.94265232975 243% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3459981802 48.9658058833 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.1 100.406767564 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.85 20.6045352989 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 5.45110844103 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233093871806 0.236089414692 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0756856587633 0.076458572812 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627793895949 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155163300846 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534812009324 0.0645574589148 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 11.7677419355 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 10.9000537634 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 86.8835125448 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.