Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role for youngsters. Do you support it or not?

Essay topics:

Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role for youngsters. Do you support it or not?

One of the most conspicuous trend of today's world is a colossal upsurge in roles models such as sports stars and film stars. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one's life. However, i don't entirely accept this and i will explain why in this essay.

There are number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that successful role models not only contribute to initiate life as youngsters, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers. Not only can one benefits more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the quality of their lives with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these benefits one stand in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.

Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned trend is that it is likely to help one's thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follow such system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, perseverance and dedication. Hence, it is apparent that why many are in favour of supporting successful people in life.

In conclusion of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of supporting glamorous film stars and sports stars as role models are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 8.2 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-10-17 aminrad 11 view
2019-08-31 yasamin.gharib62 88 view
2019-08-07 NancySood 72 view
2019-06-07 Dilpreet singh 72 view
2019-06-07 Majheal Singh 77 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
PTE_Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 206, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ll only lead to a myriad of concerns in ones life. However, i dont entirely accept t...
^^^^
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ad of concerns in ones life. However, i dont entirely accept this and i will explain...
^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...owever, i dont entirely accept this and i will explain why in this essay. Ther...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, in conclusion, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94166666667 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73342225465 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2817000077 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8333333333 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187468492072 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0643769568262 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108643724946 0.071462118173 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139969502911 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125983983881 0.0609392437508 207% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.