Space travel is fantastic these days, but there are many issues-such as environmental problems –that we should be focusing on.
What are your views on the allocation of public funding.
The importance of space traveling is fantastic these days, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of environmental issue has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on our planet in recent years. It can be said that we should be focusing on environmental issues rather than spend money on space travel. This essay will elaborate why to solve environmental problem is so important and why we need to allocate fund for space research.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why we have focus on environmental issues but the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that our planet have so many problems like greenhouse gases, deforestation, drought, flooding, global warming and so on. As an illustration, research revealed by Green for Grain shows that global temperature has been increased 5% in the last 10 years. Therefore, we have to put more emphasize on our environmental issues, not in space travel.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of money should spend to solve the environmental problem rather than space travel, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that we are facing overpopulation problem and scientist are trying to find out alternative place for us. For an example, research by UN has revealed that after 45 years later this world will be not liveable for human being. Hence, we have to allocate fund for space research to find new destination for human.
From what has been discuss above it can be concluded that we have to spend money to solve environmental issues and at the same time we have to do the space research as well.
- Some people indicate that certain kinds of music can promote learning for young children while many researchers showed that results are mixed What is your opinion 76
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 85
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. / Some people argue that experience is the best teacher. Life experience can teach more effectively than books or formal school education. How far 77
- With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. University should provide digital material rather than textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of v 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 20, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discussed'.
Suggestion: discussed
...tination for human. From what has been discuss above it can be concluded that we have ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, nevertheless, so, therefore, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03180212014 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90175508045 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530035335689 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.3995856182 50.4703680194 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.09090909091 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322750659865 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130361457052 0.0925447433944 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083465349275 0.071462118173 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204689661931 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780103162673 0.0609392437508 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.