Some people think subjects taught in school are a waste of time, while others disagree and believe that this type of education is useful for students.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
The usefulness of School’s subjects is an often debated topic. While some people believe that this kind of syllabus for schools are not practical, many still think that teaching these subjects are far more efficient for children. This essay will discuss why current content of subjects are not practical for students after leaving school.
The current subjects in school has been wrote by pedagogical experts and annually being up-to-date so as to make compatible content based on children’s need, in this fast paced world. To put simply, the curriculum in schools are wider and focus in all fields that brings more opportunities to make students employable. For instance, a non-profit Meshcat school in Tabriz provide children a vast array of lessons such as mathematics, science, geography as well as communication skills in order to bridge the gap between school and work environment by encouraging them to work as a group on defined projects since it makes them more versatile and plays an important role in their future job position. Finally, these subjects based on some point of view are capable to cope with the needs of children.
On the other hand, the opponent holds that these subjects are not state-of-the-art<span class="hiddenSpellError" pre="state-of- "></span> and schools should keep abreast of the latest development in education. In other words, students with this out of date subjects lag behind the work-related needs. For example, in the majority of construction companies in Iran about the half of engineers are unable to handle the megastructure projects by new technology such as BIM which makes an integrated platform to manage the construction projects with more proficiency as well as efficiency. It goes without saying that those students are being excelled in new technology are more marketable in the job market without having knowledge about regular subjects in schools.
In conclusion, should new subjects displace with the current one? This essay discussed why state-of-the-art subjects should be displaced by out of date ones but why some people hold the view that the current one successfully copes with the needs of students. In my opinion, the current course studies do not offer more job opportunities in the not distant future in this competitive world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-03 | Mikul Patel | 84 | view |
| 2019-01-21 | Kudrat | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-17 | Architecture | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | mostafa jahangiri | 84 | view |
- Technology is becoming increasingly prevalent in the world today. In the not too distant future, technology will completely replace the teacher in the classroom. Analyze both sides of this argument. 73
- Nowadays people try to balance their work with other things in life, but only some could actually achieve it so far.What are the reasons for that? How can we solve this problem? 73
- Some people argue that the fittest strongest individuals and teams can achieve the greatest success in sports But other people think that success is as much related to mental attitude Discuss both views and give your opinion 66
- Scientists agree that many people eat too much junk food and it is damaging their health. Some people think that this problem can be solved by educating people, while others believe that education will not work.Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- Nowadays people try to balance their work with other things in life, but only some could actually achieve it so far.What are the reasons for that? How can we solve this problem? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'written'.
Suggestion: written
...The current subjects in school has been wrote by pedagogical experts and annually bei...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 100, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...l experts and annually being up-to-date so as to make compatible content based on childr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lar subjects in schools. In conclusion, should new subjects displace with the cu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, so, still, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1964.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36612021858 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43345122251 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53825136612 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.632368247 49.4020404114 171% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.285714286 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232111125174 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885623569455 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0690786162123 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159652256751 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0939680815688 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.