The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The given charts on the paper depict data how Fairtrade-labelled bananas and coffee were sold in 1999 and 2004 in five such countries as The United Kingdom, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden.
Overall, it is clear to see that bananas and coffee sales were the highest in the UK in 2004. Moreover, UK sold more bananas even in 1999 that the others. By contrast, the other countries were not good at sales in compare with the United Kingdom.
Looking at the details, the UK had sold coffee and bananas in 1999 for 1.5 and 15 millions of euro accordingly. In 2004 the trade was increased to 20 and 47 million. To compare 1999 and 2004 in Switzerland it must be said that sales were risen as well. As for Denmark, this country had improved sales of both goods: from 1.8 to 4 and from 0.6 to 4 accordingly. However, such countries as Belgium and Sweden had bananas sales which were dropped (from 1999 with 1.8 million of euro and 2 million of euro to 2004 with 1 million and 900000 thousand of euro). As for coffee, the former sales had 1 and 1.7 million of euro, the letter has 0.8 and 1 accordingly.
- Some people become famous when they are at a young age Do you think this is positive or negative 78
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 56
- Average carbon dioxide emissions per person, 1967-2007. 78
- Working hours today are too long and people are not spending as much time as they should with their families or on leisure activities What is your opinion on this 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 80, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '15 million'.
Suggestion: 15 million
... coffee and bananas in 1999 for 1.5 and 15 millions of euro accordingly. In 2004 the trade was...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, look, moreover, so, well, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43842364532 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5261283554 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487684729064 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2385120868 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232691055608 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105510088301 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648660126403 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185597991676 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384233089309 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 85.02 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.