: Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view.
A majority of people think that a person’s intellectual skills can be improved by performing group activities. Meanwhile, some other hold to the opinion that cognitive skills are much enhanced by performing individual tasks. I myself am an advocate of the view that performing individual tasks contributes much more to increasing one’s intellectual faculties than does performing group tasks. The essay outlines my views in detail.
I agree that though group activities one can open up his mind and think from various angles. However, the skills gained through such ways is limited to the combined skills of that group. It is true that you can get many opportunities to brainstorm during the group activities and push the boundaries of your cognitive skills. However, it can sometimes become detrimental to one’s imagination, as they get compelled by the group to approach the activity in a different path.
Also, most of the inventions are an outcome of individual excellence. In the investigation report of Albert Einstein’s brain, it was found that he had used only 0.5 % of his brain’s potential. Imagine the extent humanity would have advanced had he used more than 0.5 % of his brain. What I would like to point out here is that, if you want to use your brain’s potential to more than 5 %, it can only be achieved by pushing challenging your cognitive skills through your own strengths by performing individual tasks.
In conclusion, I do not completely agree with the notion that group activities are contribute more to one’s intellectual skill development. In fact, it is through individual tasks that one can far exceed those illusionary limitations of cognitive thinking set by oneself.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | kongkona | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | Navkiran kaur | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | CANADA | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-17 | Sonali Guha | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-11 | mehnaaz | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that we cannot learn anything from the past for our life today, while others believe that history is a valuable source of information to understand human's life.Discuss both views and give your opinion.Give reasons for your answer 73
- : Some people think that a person improves their intellectual skills more when doing group activities. To what extent do you agree? Use specific details and examples to explain your view. 61
- Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company. In your letterdescribe the item you lostexplain how you lost ittell the insurance company what you would like them to do 61
- Last month you had an overseas holiday with some friends where you stayed at their house. They have just sent you some holiday photos. Write a letter to your friends. In your letter: thank them for the holiday and the photos. Explain why you didn’t writ 73
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish.Why do you think this is happening?What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'contributed'.
Suggestion: contributed
...th the notion that group activities are contribute more to one's intellectual skill d...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28158844765 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1273134294 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559566787004 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5736743543 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92857142857 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270129658136 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0939753266049 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0742705619081 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155072775097 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384000623965 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.