Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for a university to have advanced facilities rather than hire more famous teachers.
Our society invests more and more money in education, so you may notice that in many schools, equipment and facilities have been expanded and upgraded. Admittedly, improving facilities seems fairer because they can used by everyone while a good teacher cannot teach all the students. In my opinion, however, teachers are much more important than facilities, and we should spend more money on hiring good teachers rather than buying advanced equipment.
First of all, improving the facilities will bring financial burden to both schools and students. To buy better equipment, schools need a large sum of money, but not all schools can afford. So schools, especially the private ones, will choose to cover the spending by raising tuition fee. In other words, parents and students will have to pay the bill, increasing their financial pressure. Sometimes this will damage the reputation of a school, because families who are not rich enough may complain that the high cost violates equality in education. Besides, every few years, schools need a large sum of money to maintain their equipment, such as computers and laboratory instruments. The more equipment schools buy, the more money is needed, and this amount of money may be more than the money for salaries of good teachers.
Secondly, even if a school can afford the expenditure by itself, such advanced equipment and facilities may not be used in the right way without instruction from good teachers. If not given an assignment, most of the students are more willing to chat with their friends after class rather than reading a book in library or doing experiment in lab. And sometimes, students may feel discouraged that although they want to learn by themselves, they don’t know how to. Therefore, hiring famous teachers is more desirable, because good teachers can not only motivate their students but also teach them how to learn effectively with the new equipment.
Moreover, the quality of education is depended on teacher, not on equipment. Famous teachers have deep understanding of education and are good at teaching. With their experience in education, famous teachers can nurture good students without advanced facilities and equipment. They can make an abstract idea clear by giving simple examples from daily life; they can show how the universe works by drawing some pictures; they can improve our thinking ability by asking questions in different aspects.
All in all, after what I have analyzed previously, I can safely conclude that equipment and facilities are important, but teachers play a more essential role, so schools should focus on hiring some famous teachers rather than improving their facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-22 | thakannv | 40 | view |
| 2019-02-12 | Imagine Ho | 92 | view |
- The government should spend money in promoting sport and art in school rather than sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for a university to have advanced facilities rather than hire more famous teachers 92
- One of the consequences of improved medical care is that people are living longer and life expectancy is increasing. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? To be successful in business, companies must put more money in advertising. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'use'
Suggestion: use
...acilities seems fairer because they can used by everyone while a good teacher cannot...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, such as, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 9.8082437276 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 17.0 13.8261648746 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.0752688172 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2268.0 1977.66487455 115% => OK
No of words: 432.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55901411391 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67673879106 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.516203703704 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 684.0 618.680645161 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4636396131 48.9658058833 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.368421053 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7368421053 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.73684210526 5.45110844103 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259353203276 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800928801708 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0835395917111 0.0737576698707 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162649086895 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0672250190667 0.0645574589148 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.