The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line graph illustrates the Tourist Information Office in one city is received the number of inquiries in person, and by letter/email and by telephone over the period of six months from January to June in 2011.
Overall, the number of inquiries in person and by telephone saw an upward trend, while the figures for inquiries by letter/email fell significantly over the given period. Besides, the Office is gotten the best of inquiry by directing to customers.
Looking at the information in more details, we can see that inquiries in person and by telephone initiated at around 500 and 900 respectively. However, the figures for inquiries in person witnessed a striking increase, reaching the peak of nearly 2000 inquiries in the sixth month, compared with a modest rise in inquiries by telephone, which was at the highest starting point, going up to only 1600 inquiries in the last month.
In contrast, the number of inquiries by letter/email, though stood at the second place at first, then reached a plateau and showed a gradual downturn from March onward before ending almost at the bottom of under 400 inquiries, which numbers were even lower than that for inquiries in person in the beginning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 84
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 78
- Most countries want to improve the standard of living through economic development, however, others think the social value is lost as a result. Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, look, second, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1005.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7946474208 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577114427861 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 80.3035906213 43.030603864 187% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.5 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.5 22.9334400587 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 5.23603664747 226% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211407536206 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130963167941 0.103423049105 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175895549957 0.0843802449381 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180227351452 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.19835820171 0.0819641961636 242% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.