In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
these days many nations spend a large amount of money on building new railway lines for high-speed trains between urban areas. According to some, this might be a valuable investment, as people will be able to save time and the country will benefit economically. And there may be some merit in this view. Yet, in what follows it will be argued that the government ought to allocate more money for existing public transport, since the majority of the people use it and it will cost less.
Currently, public transport needs more funding, as most of the population prefer to travel by public transportation. using buses and underground is considered to be safer and less expensive. Moreover, improving existing transportation will take fewer resources. For instance, in order to have better public bus facilities, the authorities only need to add several advanced buses and make some changes in the timetable. Thus, paying more attention to public transport services is essential, as it plays a significant role in people’s daily routine and can be done at a reasonable price.
On the other hand, some say that it is crucial that the expenditure spent on fast trains should greatly increase, as it will be time-saving for people. Nowadays, it is hard to deny the value of time, and traveling from one city to another can be extremely time-consuming. another positive aspect of high-speed transport can be seen in the sphere of economy, since the trade between various places will tend to rise. Therefore, more goods will be both imported and exported by these fast trains.
In conclusion, it was shown that spending more finances on public transport facilities will be beneficial for most of the people and will demand less expanses. Though some may argue that constructing new railroads should also be taken into consideration for time-saving and economic purposes, still, the advantages of developing public transportation outweigh it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-06 | Aimee Lee Lee | 61 | view |
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Comparison of energy production 78
- Some people that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views and giv 73
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
these days many nations spend a large amount ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he people use it and it will cost less. Currently, public transport needs more f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 118, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
...fer to travel by public transportation. using buses and underground is considered to ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 273, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...nother can be extremely time-consuming. another positive aspect of high-speed transport...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rted and exported by these fast trains. In conclusion, it was shown that spendin...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 146, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun expanses is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... for most of the people and will demand less expanses. Though some may argue that co...
^^^^
Line 16, column 365, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ping public transportation outweigh it.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 7.85571142285 255% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27215189873 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92357111527 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579113924051 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3508236176 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.066666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309606495342 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10472495022 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597473000672 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192372981328 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049020406591 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.